Anonymous #1 12h

If its anti vax material id rather get a lobotomy

1

Anonymous #2 12h

My grandma is dead to because one of these morons

1

Anonymous OP 12h

You can make up your mind yourself about what you want to call it. So you don’t want to read anything at all on the matter. I’m shocked

1

Anonymous #1 12h

I have read up on it because vaccine production is simple as hell just cause most of you are to stupid to understand mrna and how there made isnt my fault

1

Anonymous OP 12h

Uh huh. Right. 😒

1

Anonymous #1 12h

The article you posted literally is saying that the protien they used in the vaccine are pathogenic IT HAS TO BE BECAUSE THE VACCINES MADE OUT OF THE PATHOGINE THAT MAKES COVID LIKE ARE YOU THAT DENSE

1

Anonymous OP 11h

… so rude. Please stop assuming I haven’t read the damn thing I just took the time to share with you and get nicer if you’re actually gonna stick around and try to talk about something like a civilized human So beyond that, why are you telling me that makes me stupid, what are you talking about

1

Anonymous #1 11h

You also spelled pathogen wrong my goodness 😒

1

Anonymous #1 11h

Vaccine is or vaccine’s

1

Anonymous #1 11h

I claimed to know science not spelling man 😭

1

Anonymous #1 11h

Im sorry yk i got heated ive had to deal with like four anti vax morons on here who think its getting rid of your hair

-1

Anonymous #1 11h

I understand that you’re trying to say that you need a sample of a pathogen to make a vaccine, everybody knows that can you please stop yelling at me about basic stuff and assuming i’m some anti vaxxer that doesn’t know that. Just read the damn thing. It’s a published paper from doctors for fucks sake, why are you yelling at me, I didn’t write it. I think you just don’t understand what the difference is between this particular “vaccine” and how it was novel compared most vaccines humans have use

1

Anonymous #1 11h

used before. And I don’t think you’ve even taken any time to read it before just screaming at me like a lunatic imbecile. Which by the way, is a really terrible way to get anybody to understand what you’re trying to say. It confused tf out of me for a moment

1

Anonymous #1 11h

Also, I think you just don’t understand what the paper is even trying to say. If your immediate reaction is “yeah it’s toxic bc it’s a ‘vaccine’”, then a lot is going over your head in terms of comprehension. A vaccine shouldn’t be toxic, at least not to a significant degree. There’s a major difference between using a pathogen as an adjuvant and it being fundamentally toxic. Fucking ridiculous ppl

1