
āit doesnāt affect youā isnāt the best argument, you can absolutely have an opinion, my point is that consensual behavior between adults isnāt morally comparable to behavior involving victims, you still shouldnāt call consenting adults gross, your argument isnāt very solid
āIt doesnāt affect meā wasnāt my argument, it was #2s. And Iām not disputing that they arenāt morally comparable, thatās not what the debate was over. The point was that we can in fact have opinions on situations not directly involving us, and the extreme example was a way to show that, because Iām positive #2 had an opinion on the Epstein situation, despite it not directly affecting them.
If the example wasnāt about consensual sex Iām confused what point your trying to get across? Epstines island is known for child trafficking and sexual assault how is that in any way shape or form comparable too two adults having sex Iām confused what you were trying to do there