Oh also OP! You could wait it out for a little bit because a non hormonal male birth control will be supposedly fda approved in 2027! It’s a hydrogel injection that last two years. There are a few places in the USA developing it but it’s existed in India for a while like RISUG if you want to look at longer studies of it!
It’s admirable when someone steps up and takes on a contraceptive burden for their partner especially since women have had that burden almost exclusively. That said, we should be cautious about how casually vasectomies—or IUDs—are presented online as quick, reversible, and risk-free. In reality, both have trade-offs.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1415167/percentage-of-contraceptive-using-women-reporting-side-effects-us/#:~:text=In%20addition%2C%20nearly%20eight%20out,using%20women%20in%20the%20U.S. This reports nearly 80% of women experiencing 2 or more side effects from birth control. It was done in 2022
… dude. Side effects are absolutely a reason to not take meds. Every medication is a cost analysis. Some meds can kill you and birth control is one of them if you have specific conditions, so it absolutely matters. Personally bc made me extremely sick and debilitating anxiety so even though it would treat my endo, I can’t be on it.
It’s literally written in the boxes for birth controls. It explains all possible side effects and severities. It’s effective and for most people, the side effects are minimal and manageable. But that does not take away from the validity of not wanting to be on a medication or the bad experience of those who have been on it and responded poorly to the medication.
It certainly can be. Birth control is amazing, lifesaving medication that should be available to any woman who wants it or needs it for medical reasons, as I do. That said, for many women, it is a pain in the ass to figure out which birth control doesn’t make you gain excess weight, break out, get headaches, throw up, experience mood swings, bleed randomly, or want to kill yourself. It is sometimes even a pain in the ass just to figure out which of the aforementioned you can tolerate.
A vasectomy is >99% effective, outpatient, and usually covered by insurance. It’s meant to be permanent, and while reversal is sometimes possible (with 70–90% success within 10 years), it’s not guaranteed. There’s also a small but serious risk of post-vasectomy pain syndrome (~1–2%), which can cause chronic discomfort. Cost ranges from $0 to $1,000, depending on insurance and provider.
IUDs (copper or hormonal) are also >99% effective, last 3–10 years, and are immediately reversible upon removal. They require no surgery, but insertion can be painful, and hormonal types may cause side effects like mood changes, cramping, or spotting. A serious but rare complication is uterine perforation, which occurs in 1–2 per 1,000 insertions (0.1–0.2%), with higher risk in postpartum or breastfeeding women. Cost ranges from $0 to $1,300, depending on insurance.
#67 has been all up and down here saying nonsense, but I do agree with them about circumcision. There are cases where circumcision is medically beneficial, but if you don’t have to surgically modify a newborn’s genitals for them to be healthy, why take the risk? Like, most guys will be able to keep their stuff clean regardless. It’s like tonsils — some people need ‘em out, but some people’s tonsils don’t bother them at all, so might as well not undergo surgery to remove them.
Yeah, I’m not really a fan of piercing babies’ ears either. I remember getting mine pierced at a Claire’s in the mall by a random teenage cashier. Knowing what I know now about their sanitization practices (or lack thereof) I wouldn’t let a baby within 10 feet of one of those piercing guns lol.
Yeah, I love the energy OP’s bf is giving but an IUD probably is the safer way to go if they ever want biological kids. Just as a PSA, another thing that can happen with an IUD is pelvic inflammatory disease. Not very likely but worth knowing the symptoms so you can haul ass to the doctor if you think you might have it. It can make you infertile.
coercing someone into making a major reproductive health decision is always 100% wrong and a violation of their fundamental right to bodily autonomy. if somebody ever tries to force you or trick you into getting a vasectomy, tell them to go fuck themselves. but if your gf asks, “babe, would you ever get a vasectomy?” it might help you to know she is not asking you to literally sacrifice your balls
I understand she would never trick me into doing something just like I would never coerce her into making a decision. however, we both understand in our own perspective that the potential risk of doing such a thing would carry unnecessary risk to any future children especially at this young age. While I understand the nice gesture being made it appears to be poorly thought out and quite honestly irresponsible and pick me.
it does sound like an IUD for OP is a more practical choice, but you lost me with calling her bf a pick-me lmao. like yes, he wants to be picked. they are talking about getting married to each other. they are planning to pick each other for the rest of their lives. like imagine they get married and she texts him while he’s at work to remind him they’re out of advil or smth and he’s like “idk i don’t want to respond too fast. she can’t know i’m into her. that’s cringe”
Their likelihood of being reversible does decline with time tho. It’s the primary reason I turned down my ex’s request for me to get snipped when I was 21. We both don’t want kids, but I remembered her talking about revisiting the (biological) kids discussion once we’re both settled in to our careers and over 30. That, higher risks of malpractice as a black person, and insurance not always covering reversals was enough to discourage me
Yeah that’s not equivalent at all. Tubes tied is less reversible than a vasectomy especially depending on the method of “tying”, it’s also more likely to accidentally cause pregnancy still or to fail, and on top of that it’s a much more major surgery than a vasectomy. You have to be under for longer, but through muscle and fat, and much longer recovery time (weeks).
Not saying that all men should get vasectomies, just that it’s truly not comparable to tying your tubes. Plus for a vasectomy men will get opioid type pain killers and women can sometimes only get ibuprofen even though the women would have many more incisions and pain. (Which is just bad doctors and outdated medical advice but a reality nonetheless)
All sex is risky, it can always lead to pregnancy, and even when you’re married you both might not want any kids. It’s not a ridiculous suggestion for a man to get a vasectomy. In this case with OP I think they should just wait until the non hormonal male bc comes out because that’s the safest and least problematic option for their situation.