Anonymous #7 1w

Considering there’s going to be a statue built in that fuckers honor, yeah we should be rioting

81

Anonymous #10 1w

The media is going to cover it wayyy more since it’s what brings clicks/views as well

4

Anonymous #11 1w

Also he was famous a lot of people knew of him of course he is getting attention. Just like if a celebrity you liked got murdered.

15

Anonymous #9 1w

Oh cry about it

-21

Anonymous #7 1w

So you’re saying that a single death is worse than hundreds of children dying?

62

Anonymous #2 1w

Sorry for your loss

36

Anonymous #7 1w

Problem is there are certain ppl who don’t see it as the same issue some people want to blame other individuals when it’s just our government whose at fault

41

Anonymous #15 1w

i mean... the president has a history of being nonchalant abt school shootings, even said we should "move on" not even 24 hours after one happened. and yet, he made more noise abt charlie kirk.

15

Anonymous #11 1w

No, children being shot in the head are not being reported nearly as much, less people know about the shootings that have happened this week (at least 3) because there’s blanket coverage for a shit man. People are actually sobbing for him, he didn’t deserve to die but people are purposely ignoring that he was a terrible person.

8

Anonymous #11 1w

I’d think an innocent child should get more attention that a racist

22

Anonymous #9 1w

Look up on tiktok I have seen a lot of sympathy for them maybe it is not on your feed but it’s on mine. Again maybe not as much attention but he was famous. Also he was not racist he had many friends of other colors and talked very respectful when they came up to the mic. He also spoke the lord, loved his family, and wanted to see the best for America that is not a terrible person.

2

Anonymous #16 1w

i don’t care about the president it’s just a disrespectful thing to post after what just happened. have some simple human decency, some sympathy at the least

-1

Anonymous #9 1w

Let’s not forget all the attention that was given to MLK jr. when he got assassinated. Maybe not so much on social media bc it wasn’t like that back then but it was all over radio and tv.

5

Anonymous #17 1w

Like excusing children’s death bc this man was a lot more cool like wtf 😂😂

11

Anonymous OP 1w

Absolutely no one is excusing children’s deaths? wtf

12

Anonymous #2 6d

Sending you love and hugs

11

Anonymous #11 6d

MLK is VERY different from Kirk. What MLK built Kirk was actively against

13

Anonymous #12 6d

"I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights." - Charlie Kirk (April 5, 2023, TPUSA Faith event)

22

Anonymous #17 6d

For the past four years, firearms have remained the number one cause of death for young people aged 1–17 in the U.S., surpassing car crashes, drug overdoses, and cancer.

25

Anonymous #17 6d

Post the rest of the quote from that debate why don’t you. 50,000 people die in car accidents a year but that’s the price we pay for having the luxury of driving places. Everything we have comes at some sort of cost

6

Anonymous #20 6d

That’s the most ridiculous comparison I’ve ever heard. You don’t compare a car you use to drive to Starbucks to a gun whose purpose is to kill people. What’s next — “walking down the stairs causes deaths, so it’s a luxury”?

17

Anonymous #17 6d

go ahead and listen to the ENTIRE speech. not just the part that fits your agenda

4

Anonymous #17 6d

Post the whole speech!!! He did not say gun deaths are “OK” or that they didn’t matter when they happen. “ let’s be very clear that you are not going to get gun deaths to zero, it will not happen. You can significantly reduce them … we should have an honest and clear reductionist view of gun violence, but we should not have a utopian one”

11

Anonymous #19 6d

MLK and Kirk were both public speakers who used their voice for their beliefs. They both got assassinated for their opinions and became what people were talking about on news and other platforms. The only difference is what they believed in, the platforms available back then compared to now. The main point is that they got assassinated for talking about their beliefs and became the talking point in news, radio, and now on social media for Kirk.

1

Anonymous #11 6d

Yes I see it on the media too! that protest in London had between 110,000-150,000 people chanting Charlie’s name. There were protests in Japan, South Korea, Australia all to condone his murder. Citizens of New Zealand performing the Hakka for his family. If you are reading this but haven’t heard of these protest please go look it up. I think there’s a blindness about what is happening across the world

5

Anonymous #11 6d

And mlk fought for equality while Charlie Kirk was a racist piece of shit who would shout slurs. They are not the same.

1

Anonymous #9 6d

When did he say a racist slur? Is this what you’re referring to?

5

Anonymous #15 6d

Disrespectful but Charlie made his whole platform out of being disrespectful? I’ll take it a step further, he made his platform out of being a terrible human being. He openly admitted that the civil rights bills were a mistake as he told that to young black children. He admitted that he was ok with having shootings, because that’s just the price that we have to pay for the Second Amendment, Right? Totally not sick ideology at all.

1

Anonymous #22 6d

Look at the context with what he said. He said the civil rights bill was a mistake because it was so long, and it should have been written differently, that the outcome of the civil rights act of 1964 resulted unintentionally in MORE racism where it didn’t exist previously. He loved the intention of the act but disliked it because it didn’t accomplish what it was meant to do.

4

Anonymous #22 6d

Read my response to #15, you’ll see that he never said gun deaths are okay

2

Anonymous #12 6d

They were “worth it” though

-1

Anonymous #9 6d

To keep the second amendment. Sorry but that is our right to have. Also people are still going to kill with other things just like Iryna Zaruska he is a criminal and used a knife most likely because he isn’t allowed to have a firearm. Also we have heard of criminals getting guns illegally. That is taking the guns away from law abiding citizens and making us vulnerable when criminals access them illegally or use other things. We need self defense.

2

Anonymous #20 6d

So you’re okay with children dying and paying the price for the luxury of guns. What the fuck is wrong with you

2

Anonymous #12 6d

And that part of the quote is fucking common sense. No one is expecting it to drop to zero, but his fuck face was okay with keeping things the way they are now instead of trying to fix the fucking problem. Gun control would lower the rates exponentially, and maybe we wouldn’t have a school shooting every day

7

Anonymous #9 6d

Also the rates in 2023 of people that used firearms for self defense was 61,000-65,000 and for homicides it was 17,900 so that easily shows guns are used for the better in many cases to save lives. If you don’t believe me you can look it up.

6

Anonymous #9 6d

No

8

Anonymous #12 6d

—

2

Anonymous #12 6d

—

6

Anonymous #9 6d

This is the context which clearly you haven’t taken the effort to look up

2

Anonymous #12 6d

Least you can do is read this. I’d focus on the last paragraph

2

Anonymous #12 6d

He literally said “idk” to the fact that gun control helps. He refuses to look at the facts and is feeding into the narrative that nothing can be done to fix it. He was a shit person who believed that gun violence has no actual solution and now he’s dead because of it. Won’t mourn a dumbass piece of shit.

4

Anonymous #9 6d

That was rhetorical, his response for how to stop them is right after. Omg please watch the video and do your research I shouldn’t have to spoon feed you

5

Anonymous #9 6d

I’m just going to send you the video atp

7

Anonymous #11 6d

Yea, some sources say 49% of gun owners have used them to stop others from shooting, and other sources say it’s less than 1.9%. I’m not sure where that boundary lies, but I know that stronger gun laws keeps people who shouldn’t have guns from having guns. Stricter legislation is key.

2

Anonymous #22 6d

Exactly, the issue at hand is not the guns themselves, it’s mental health and the sick individuals who feel the need to harm others, as a society we are failing mentally ill citizens. If there’s something that needs to change THAT is it. And there’s a billion factors contributing to mental illness today, especially social media.

4

Anonymous #12 6d

The context in which he says it and how he says it is not ok. Charlie multiple times has said that it was wrong and has not explained why. But if I’m seeing this wrong, I’d like to see a link of him explaining what he thinks is bad about it. But it doesn’t help his case that he has been on air multiple times just being flat out racist. “Oh boy, I hope this black pilot is qualified”

1

Anonymous #22 6d

I do agree stricter legislation is important too

1

Anonymous #22 6d

That wasn’t meant to be @ you, my bad

1

Anonymous #12 6d

I agree, mental health is a major part of the problem. It’s far too easy to get guns in many states in America. But again, it’s to be said that Charlie projected that violence into the world. Saying things like having shootings is the price we pay for the second amendment is wrong. And I am further upset by the fact that none of this respect was shown for Melissa Hortman and her family.

4

Anonymous #22 6d

Yeah I mean honestly I didn’t even see on the news about Melissa Hortman and her family and that is equally horrible and such a tragedy :( nobody deserves that

3

Anonymous #12 6d

No one does, but my point being is that Charlie Kirk’s death is blown so far out of proportion. Trump even said that it would be a waste of time to call Tim Waltz about the death. A state legislators violent death was laughed at and pushed down, but a political commentator gets the flags at half mast :/

1

Anonymous OP 6d

See this is wrong with society no one is saying that the lives lost of children is worth less than Charlie Kirk death, people don’t understand is that gun control has gotten out of hand , that all innocent lives matter Kirk’s and the children, it’s the governments fault at hand and people wanna be mad at each other when they should be mad at the government smh

4

Anonymous #23 6d

It’s not what you’re saying is the problem, it’s what you’re NOT saying. I’m simply arguing that the publication of his death is blown out of proportion, because of who he was and who liked him. The publication of school shootings is basically nonexistent, and it pisses me off that this one death is bringing so much hate.

5

Anonymous #22 6d

I thinks that’s valid, I can agree with that, both can be horrible events, and school shootings SHOULD get more coverage. Like it’s been a tragic week all around and I hate for people to think that no one cares about those children. My heart goes out to them and their poor families

6

Anonymous #12 6d

It has been so tragic. Don’t get me wrong, I disagreed so heavily with Charlie Kirk, but watching him lose his life was soul sucking for me. I literally sat in my room and just stared at the floor. It is so upsetting that we Americans have such a large gun control issue.

8

Anonymous #22 6d

I have respect for you ❤️

7

Anonymous #12 6d

❤️

7

Anonymous #24 6d

That’s funny considering that the shooter was a conservative, raised in a conservative family, and Tyler Robinson’s grandma went on video saying that he was maga. You are a loser, just letting you know :)

7

Anonymous #24 6d

Majority of shootings are done by conservatives (75%)

6

Anonymous #24 6d

So his death is more important than the deaths of hundreds of children

3

Anonymous #9 6d

It’s crazy, I know, so I don’t understand how or where liberals and transgender people are getting thrown into the problem

1

Anonymous #22 6d

The way me and all my leftist and transgender friends all have guns and went thru hunter safety. And none of us are celebrating death. It just proves our point and our beliefs about better gun safety and gun control. To shoot a human you need to have some sort of mental health or behavioral issues. This person shouldn’t have had access to firearms nor weapons of any sort. Bow hunting season just opened. I don’t think he should have a bow either. Not just guns.

9

Anonymous #24 6d

Gun and weapon violence doesn’t discriminate. don’t be fooled.

4

Anonymous #9 5d

And guess what!!!!! This was wasn’t! The president wasn’t so check your sources bro

3

Anonymous #24 5d

What?

1

Anonymous #24 5d

One more “was”, also it literally was. His entire family confirmed they’re crazy conservatives

1

Anonymous #9 4d

Oh yea he hated trump and had a trans boyfriend. Sure he’s really conservative

4

Anonymous #24 4d

telling someone else to check their sources while spreading misinformation is so crazy. that trans boyfriend shit isn't even verified. check your sources.

0

Fox claims they got this info from the FBI but the FBI never released this information

1

Anonymous #24 1d

Yuppp Officially verified who he was now

1