Anonymous #1 1w

What about two state solution?

8

Anonymous OP 1w

Yes that’s essentially what that answer translates to. A two state solution is very much Zionist bc it doesn’t seek to dismantle the settler colony and divides Palestinian land of which the Palestinians should have sovereignty over. Also Israel has literally made a two state solution nearly impossible with the West Bank settlements and the ethnic cleansing of Gaza

1

Anonymous #1 1w

What if they just gave the land back they took from the 1940s and then it’s back to being even the un gave it?

-1

Anonymous OP 1w

No bc that’s still settler colonialism. Their land should have never been stolen

1

Anonymous #2 1w

How would that even work?

2

Anonymous #1 1w

It wasn’t stolen, it was granted to each by the UN

-2

Anonymous OP 1w

No, it was a settler colonial project spearheaded by Herzl in the late 19th century/early 20th century. Britain legitimized it in 1917 along with the UN 30 years later after they stepped down

3

Anonymous #1 1w

u might be getting downvoted but ur not lying. The two state solution will never work cause israel wont stop until all palestinians are gone and the land is fully theirs. If it hasn't worked for the years this conflict has been brewing for, that makes ppl think things will be different all of a sudden?

2

Anonymous #3 1w

Literally most of the media and democratic politicians claim to support a two state solution and yet they’re still Zionist scum 😭 a two state solution is inherently violent. I think ppl are just uneducated on settler colonialism

1

Anonymous #1 1w

The UN partition wasn’t just Britain rubber-stamping colonialism, it was an international decision after WWII to create two states side by side. You can call Zionism “settler colonial,” but the actual borders and legitimacy came from a UN vote, not just Herzl or Britain.

-1

Anonymous #1 1w

and it's actually so mind blowing to me cause wtf do those ppl think the oregon trail was??

6

Anonymous OP 1w

the only reason the two states was created is cause those countries didnt want the jews back in their countries cause why couldn't they just create refugee camps and compensate the jews who had lost so much instead of sending them to an unknown land to be ruled by a gov that was put together in basically no time at all?

3

Anonymous OP 1w

An international solution that took everyone’s perspective in mind except for the Palestinians themselves 🤔 hmmm. Yes you’re right, it wasn’t just Britain rubber stamping colonialism but most of the western world rubber stamping it. The UN is not some benevolent force

6

Anonymous #1 1w

honestly the UN is literally not even a force at all. the UN is literally made up from the volunteer efforts of countries' governments. If a country doesn't want something to happen they just don't donate and the UN cant make it happen tbh (this is a very rough estimation on how this shit works). Hell, countries can sign some shit the UN puts together and then blatantly ignore it cause the UN doesn't have the power to enforce it 🤷‍♀️

0

Anonymous #3 1w

Well that’s what Palestine did and they they fought to protect their land, even though it was awarded over, and they lost. I’m not saying any compromise is perfect. But a return to a two state solution would be miles better than Israel bombing the shit out of Gaza and gobbling it up all themselves

11

Anonymous OP 1w

the two state solutions is THE REASON gaza is getting destroyed rn

2

Anonymous #3 1w

No it’s because Israel is trying to steal everything

0

Anonymous OP 1w

✋🫩 stop being dumb on purpose

0

Anonymous #3 1w

How am I being dumb? You’re the one not making sense

0

Anonymous OP 1w

if im not making sense to you, you reading leve gotta be below 8th grade man

0

Anonymous #3 1w

You sound like you’re grasping at some misplaced sense of moral judgment. I’m saying “it’s big enough for the two of them, just remove their nukes and let them coexist”

0

Anonymous OP 1w

that's literally not how it works and that would never work either. I've been 1000% real with what in saying this entire time, if u cant understand i have no other idea why other than u have 0 comprehension skills

-1

Anonymous OP 1w

im not going to talk politics with someone who doesn't understand the basics bro ✋💀 go outside or something

0

Anonymous #3 1w

See, when your logic falls apart you start with the ad hominem arguments. I’ve been calmly explaining from the beginning and I still haven’t gotten a sufficient reason why a two state solution wouldn’t work.

4

Anonymous #4 1w

Exactly. Thank you!

-2

Anonymous #4 1w

No it’s the absolute worst option and would never work with the West Bank settlements dotted all throughout Palestinian territory

4

Anonymous #1 1w

Then rezone it. The land itself should have multiple areas anyway

4

Anonymous #3 1w

Regardless it’s too late for that now.

3

Anonymous #7 1w

Just bc it exists doesn’t mean it should and it most definitely CAN be dismantled. Actually it continuing to exist threatens the lives of the whole region

-1

Anonymous #7 1w

That’s true!

0

Anonymous #1 1w

How would it be dismantled without causing ww3?

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Again it existing will cause WW3!! Palestine must be liberated

0

Anonymous #1 1w

how? how would it be dismantled? that’s a genuine question, how do you dismantle a country that DOES exist even if you think it shouldn’t?

1

Anonymous #7 1w

Girl have you ever read history? Countries and empires fall all the time. Literally just switch out the governmental structures and end partition, apartheid, segregation. Give sovereignty back to Palestinians. We cannot just accept genocide

0

Yall need to read a book

0

Are you fr, you don’t even know what Zionism means two years in..

0

It’s not that hard to google it

0

Anonymous #1 1w

okay and who’s gonna switch out the government? and how?

10

Anonymous #7 1w

Palestinians and thru whatever means necessary, it’s their country and it’s their movement. We have no right to interfere or have a say in that from our ivory tower

-1

Anonymous #1 1w

“we have no say” and yet you’re out here saying shit

1

Girl what… no. So politically illiterate it hurts. That’s not what colonialism means. Read frantz fanon

0

Anonymous #7 1w

We have no say in how an indigenous ppl run their own country… but we can for sure criticize the settler colony colonizing them and call for an end to it??

0