Anonymous #1 23h

this is bordering on eugenics btw

-1

Anonymous #3 23h

people used to commit infanticide against female babies on the basis of their sex, if you can understand how that’s wrong (and would have also been wrong through aborting) then you should understand how this is wrong.

6

Anonymous #3 11h

infantcide is nowhere near equivalent to abortion. and if ur not the one pushing the kid out u don’t have a say

1

Anonymous #3 11h

i understand that it’s controversial but i believe it’s humane to not bring life into the world given the current state of it. and statistics literally show that this generation of men is more conservative than boomers. it’s more than valid if a woman doesn’t want to put her body through 9 months of pregnancy just to potentially add to that pool of incels. and no how you raise them doesn’t guarantee they’ll be the exception

1

Anonymous #3 11h

and same goes for having daughters. i personally wouldn’t bring a girl into the world either knowing the 1 in 3 women get assaulted in their lifetime. and that would be a humane reason to abort also. killing actual human born babies is awful ofc and can’t be justified by anything but abortion doesn’t kill human people

1

Anonymous #1 10h

tbf it’s ~80% of women that have been SA’d & 40% of men that have been SA’d. that’s the main reason I don’t want children at all, since no matter their gender there’s a massive chance I can’t protect them, whether from assault or propaganda

1

Anonymous #3 10h

okay so what’s the issue with my comment?

1

Anonymous #1 6h

choosing to abort based on genetics is eugenics by definition lol. not wanting a kid because of the social climate is another thing entirely.

1

Anonymous #3 6h

oh well I think any reason to abort is a valid one

1