I went to Cornell I’ve known about this horrific story since 2024. Everybody on that campus and every woman around the world knows they are guilty. It just seems to be some asshole men who would rather take the risk of defending 7 rapists rather than one liar. Which btw, she isn’t lying!

146

Comment Deleted

0

Ladies someone else take time out of your day to explain to this clown how trauma works. He’s too far gone I’m afraid

85

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous OP 1w

I understand that trauma can cause memories to work in weird ways and that a lot of the time it takes time to fully understand what happened. But if a precedent is set that someone can come back years later and entirely rewrite a course of events from how she originally described them and we now just have to ignore her original testimony, doesn’t this force us to legally consider any victims testimony after a traumatic event as something that cant be taken as fully trustworthy?

13

Anonymous #5 1w

Here’s something to consider that just occurred to me. There are plenty of gay men who will get loaded up on alcohol or drugs or a combination of both and do all manner of unspeakable acts with five 10, 15 other men. If that one man came out later and said he had been raped Would you agree with him? Would you say all the other men should’ve known not to touch him because of his potential lack of awareness? Hmmmm

30

Comment Deleted

0

Well, you say she got raped by five and then say she got raped by seven, so which is it? And if it was only by five, why are the group being referred to as the Cornell seven? Unless, as I have repeatedly stated, there are varying accounts as to what happened and the truth remains elusive.

-5

this is the right sentiment but different numbers than what i’ve seen. I’ve heard she consented to two threesomes as well as one other man, which means 5 consensual who facilitated it and 2 who raped her. this would line up with cornells punishment, as 2 guys were expelled and 5 were suspended

-4

Anonymous #4 1w

There was overlap between the threesomes it was only 4 that actually engaged in sexual activity with her

6

Anonymous #1 1w

Facilitating the rape is fucking rape are you really that stupid??

38

Anonymous #3 1w

she still said she consented to both threesomes though, no? the whole actual events of the night is so confusing

3

Anonymous #4 1w

“Consenting” while under the influence is not consent

14

Anonymous #6 1w

But if she consented to two of them, then they were not facilitating rape. I’m sorry you’re so fucking stupid.

-7

Being able to recount events and being capable of making rational decisions are not abilities that you lose at the same level of inebriation.

6

Anonymous #6 1w

Except that by Law in New York if you’re under the influence willingly (which she said she was) her consent still counts.

6

Anonymous #3 1w

I don’t give a damn about New York law allowing rape. It’s still not consent

3

Anonymous #6 1w

Ok then if you believe that then none of the guys could consent either and it was mutual rape.

0

Anonymous #6 1w

it’s not, I agree with you, but in the state of New York if you willingly take drugs and willingly drink on your own accord that exonerates the point of impaired consent. I don’t know why the fuck that is the law there but it is

6

Anonymous #3 1w

If you think that being capable of agreeing to sex and making the decision to fucking rape someone are on the same level, then you have abysmal morals

11

Anonymous #6 1w

So the law doesn’t matter? I get it, it’s a terrible event, nobody in the scenario behaved morally at all, but laws fucking matter.

0

Anonymous #1 1w

I don’t think the law matters when it fails to address or even permits disgusting and horrific actions. That’s why we elect people to change laws all the time

1

Anonymous #6 1w

I’m not making a moral argument, obviously everything that happened was immoral. But in the situation where both parties are equally under the influence and both parties agree to have sex, I don’t understand how that make the guys rapists?

9

Anonymous #3 1w

That’s part of my question too when it comes to let’s say just one boy and one girl who are both insanely intoxicated and have sex. Everybody wants the man to somehow overcome his intoxication and do the right thing because the woman was too intoxicated to give consent. Why is he held accountable to an action and she isn’t? He’s the aggressor and she’s the victim. It’s bullshit.

1

Anonymous #3 1w

Her saying yes and then being unconscious by the time that the men invited over more people to join in on abusing her is why I say that they raped her

5

Anonymous #6 1w

But she didn’t ever say in her original report that she was ever unconscious?

1

Anonymous #6 1w

She quite literally states that when she told the guys she was tired they stopped and it ended.

8

Anonymous #3 1w

Do you consider the fact that the original report could have been inaccurate? Especially since she was so inebriated and may not have fully remembered or understood what happened?

8

Anonymous #6 1w

The law still matters. It might need changing, but until that happens, it matters. And what makes the actions disgusting, and horrific? If she willingly chose to get drunk, which she did before, arriving at the frat house and willingly chooses to engage in drugs, which she did when she got there and she said yes to at least three people having sex with her, she made her choice.

0

Anonymous #6 1w

lol. Ok.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

And now you are literally victim blaming her

4

Anonymous #1 1w

They facilitated it by inviting more people over and then standing by while they raped her. How am I the stupid one when you can’t understand something so simple?

20

Anonymous #6 1w

Of course I’ve considered that and it’s a very real possibility, but you’re basing all of your opinions on what MIGHT have happened instead of what all of the evidence we currently have suggests happened.

0

Anonymous #3 1w

The evidence we currently have is her current testimony dumbass

8

Anonymous #6 1w

SHE SIGNED OFF ON HER ORIGINAL REPORT.

1

Hey twink, even if she consented to 2 dudes she was raped by the other 5. She had feelings for Matthew Ingalls and was stuck in a weird spot between comprehending what he did to her vs caring about his feelings. You don’t know jackshit about rape, consent, or trauma and keep opening your cuck mouth to speak on it as if you’re some genius. Sit this one out brother

83

Comment Deleted

0

You’re a twink why u in girl talk defending men? Like do you not see how gay that is? Zip it up when ur done

38

Anonymous OP 1w

All I have said ultimately is that we want the truth and we don’t currently have it. The fact that that bothers you speaks volumes. Piss right the fuck off.

-20

Anonymous #1 1w

We do, you’re just choosing to listen to what looksmaxxers have to say about it rather than reading the evidence yourself.

42

Comment Deleted

0

Shooting blanks. Go read the evidence before you open your chud mouth

47

Anonymous OP 1w

Cry harder bitch

-19

Anonymous #1 1w

And there’s the misogyny

54

Anonymous #1 1w

Please give your asshole to my friends and I for a night. We’ll show you what consent means when we shove a mop up it

53

Anonymous #6 1w

I am literally not.

-3

Anonymous #1 1w

You are blaming her use of drugs for the fact that something horrible happened to her

8

Comment Deleted

0

Airball

48

Anonymous #6 1w

Is it? Why do you think I’m a guy? 🤔

7

Anonymous OP 1w

“My friends and ME”. Learn English.

-14

Anonymous #6 1w

No, I’m saying that if she was in a state where the law says that her being inebriated at her own hand takes away her ability to consent or not, then she made the choice to engage in that behavior.

-1

Anonymous #6 1w

She created a situation where the law actively rules against her. Maybe unknowingly, but she did that.

-1

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #1 1w

Embarrassing because mine was grammatically correct 😭. So loud and so wrong

56

It’s like missing the shot and then speaking more about it at the postgame conference. Keep embarrassing yourself twink

49

Anonymous OP 1w

It 100% was not. It’s one thing to not know it. It’s another level of stupid to double down on it.

-18

Anonymous OP 1w

i actually don’t know what this thread is even about ngl but i’m an english major nerd so “my friends and I” is used when you are the subject of the statement while “my friends and me” is when something is happening to you or involving you, so in your case you are requesting #1’s asshole, making #1 the subject, so grammatically it would be “My friends and me” #nitpicking

19

Anonymous OP 1w

Oh sweetie. Do you really wanna have a battle of wits? Let me check my brain at the door and we’ll start even.

-23

Anonymous #4 1w

It’s literally interchangeable. And the thread you’re joining in on is this dork who defends rapists for a living. He realized he was wrong and is deflecting. You’re welcome

21

Anonymous #4 1w

essentially its the same thing if you remove the “friends” part. you would say “I punched him” but you wouldn’t say “he punched I”

0

Anonymous OP 1w

its not interchangeable i don’t know why you are so mad at me for this lol i’m just dropping in with a fun fact i didn’t mean any disrespect or anything

8

Anonymous #4 1w

Or more succinctly, you just split it up to make it make sense. Give your asshole to my friends. Give your asshole to me. You would never say give your asshole to I.

0

Anonymous #4 1w

Because where are your social cues

17

Anonymous #1 1w

Yeah I would. Give your asshole to I. I have a mop ready

18

Anonymous OP 1w

Never once defended a rapist. Never once.

-6

Anonymous OP 1w

i’m not a part of this conversation the social cues aren’t relevant bro you said something that wasn’t true and I told you the truth as I have been educated on. you learn something new every day. argue with the guy that is defending rapists, not the guy that gave you an english lesson lol

-4

Anonymous OP 1w

You remain a fucking idiot.

-1

Anonymous #1 1w

Damn bro the sarcasm flew right over your smooth brained head

24

Anonymous OP 1w

“Oh my God, #4. How dare you interject and not drop to your knees and kiss this bitch bitches ass and tell her how wonderful she is for fighting the good fight even though she is ignoring what people say accusing them of things that they never did and using bad English in the process. How dare you!” The OP is a 🤡

-7

Anonymous #4 1w

Still, to be clear, haven’t defended rapists ever. Certainly not in this conversation.

-8

Anonymous OP 1w

Where was the sarcasm? You think the two methods of speech are interchangeable. That’s where the fucking idiot comment came from.

-3

Anonymous OP 1w

Wait can we sign up for this even if we agree with tou.

1

Anonymous #6 1w

“I don’t give a damn about the states law where this occurred and has legislation over!!! The actual law means nothing only my opinion on it and I KNOW it was rape she totally didn’t snort ketamine off a penis willingly and get a train ran on her!”

1

Anonymous #8 1w

OK great. You don’t sound unhinged at all. I’m so glad you KNOW so much about this. 🙄

1

Anonymous #9 1w

The situation in the image is literally rape by the way, even if she consented to do that shit with a couple dudes doesn’t mean you can just add more people into it without permission from her

16

Rapists and you provide no evidence it’s okay tho you can still choose to live your life ignorant and only choose to belive what’s most convenient for you ✌️♥️

-6

Anonymous #9 1w

You’re who I’m talking about specifically if you’re defending these vile fuckers. Nobody should ever be sexually assaulted, EVER.

8

Anonymous #12 1w

Stop trying to justify rape you stupid fuck.

12

Anonymous #11 1w

#12 is pointing out something that actually happened. That is not justifying rape. You stupid fuck.

0

Comment Deleted

0

Holy misogyny Batgirl

4

Anonymous #1 1w

Consent is specific you DUMB FUCK. If you consent to ONE thing that does NOT mean you consent to another. You are ACTUALLY A FUCKING BRAIN DEAD LOSER THAT UR MOM NEEDED TO ABORT. If you consent to head from ur girl does that mean you consent to getting fucked in the ass??? THINK YOU IDIOT

4

Anonymous #15 1w

ESPECIALLY if you’re under the influence you CAN’T CONSENT ANYWAYS

4

Anonymous #1 1w

she did not idk where tf u got that info and she definitely didt consent to the other 50 men in the group chat either, she only knew 1 guy matheww who was her friend and than got her high off ketamine and invited his frat group chat for "free p*ssy" so idk why u defending weridos

3

Anonymous #16 1w

Calm down. I have different information than you have. Neither one of us knows which one is absolutely correct. And I’m not defending anyone. I’m merely interested in the truth. Whatever that happens to be.

0

Anonymous #17 1w

Why? Cause you don’t know how to read?

6

Right… because reputation matters more than someone’s well-being… not to mention that number one is blatantly not true because there are people who will still call the person claiming assault a lying whore, slut, and all other names under the sun regardless. Because even if somebody has been evidentially proven to be raped, they will still be treated like shit. Because we live in a world that blames victims instead of perpetrators. Regardless, if it’s false or not.

4

Anonymous #15 1w

Not to MENTION that when people come forward with an allegation, they understand that there’s going to be backlash, so it’s an incredibly calculated risk just so they get justice. They know they’re going to get shit for coming forward. Why the fuck would they come forward on a lie??? I’m not saying that false allegations don’t happen, but that is so few and far between it feels like a useless fucking point to be made

2

Comment Deleted

0

I’m confused of what these blurred out words mean just say what you mean. There’s no need to censor

4

Are you saying hoe and rapist?

2

Comment Deleted

0

OK, then give me a letter for 200 Steve

2

Comment Deleted

0

You just actually are disrespectful. Nothing to be misconstrued. If you know those words will come off that way maybe don’t use them. Even in a censored way

4

Genuinely this argument is fucking pointless because you can enjoy sex consensually as a woman and claim that online and you’ll get bashed and clowned for it, Meanwhile, you commit a literal felony and can still become the president of the United States

1