
this vigilantism is so fucking dangerous. not only are you inciting violence against a case that is still open, shit like this causes mistrials and actual criminals to walk free. A mother in the midwest had her windows smashed in because her son shared a name with the second to last guy listed here. if you support shit like this you are practically an anarchist. Once we get all the information and trials are finalized you can throw them to the wolves for all i care. let justice be served
you are right but your wording is confusing OP. let me clear this up. in the midwest there is a Matthew Ingalls and his mom has had people committing vandalism to her house and breaking windows as a fucked up act of “justice” or whatever. point is— obviously not the same Ingalls household, but their address got posted online and they are still getting floods of mail threating to kill them because people online think they know everything. thats why i said my og comment too
OP you are completely right, as a victim myself I went through this same process, which is why I believe her, but there are a few actually strange pieces of evidence including her texting one of the frat guys about a month later saying “i love you, king” and “if anybody gives you shit send them to me, ill fuck them up” (paraphrasing) which is really really fucking strange behavior. we just need to wait and learn more about the case as it unfolds
Why are you defending even an alleged rapist? Have you been accused before yourself? It’s really odd behavior for someone to defend somebody who has been even accused of the most heinous acts. Especially when there is evidence from the boys GC, statements from Jane Doe saying that what happened that night was not 90% not consensual
I understand where your coming from, and I recognize that there are two sides to the story. Yes, there are conflicting statements and text messages from her that deserve to be considered. But there is also her account: she says roughly 90% of what happened was not consensual and that she only agreed to have sex with two of the seven men. I’ve been in a similar situation myself, and I also have a background in psychology and an understanding of trauma.
From both perspectives, I know that someone’s behavior after an assault does not necessarily tell you whether the original encounter was consensual. Trauma responses can be extremely complicated. A person may continue talking to, seek connection with, or even become attached to someone who assaulted them, and that does not automatically mean an assault didn’t occur. That’s why I think the entire picture matters, not just selected texts afterward.
No he just worded it in a bad way. Matthew Ingalls is the name of one of the men however the address that got leaked belongs to an entirely different Matthew ingalls. Now a whole family that has nothing to do the case is getting harassed and their property is getting vandalized because people online took it upon themselves to try to deliver justice and are actually just making the situation worse.
why the fuck would that article LIST the address that is being harrassed?? are you slow? 99% of people call anything outside of NYC upstate. its like how chicagoans don’t claim naperville and evanston but if you live outside chicago you don’t even know those places you just call it chicago
… this is nowhere NEAR upstate NY. It’s not even up in the state. Upstate NY is in the Adirondacks which are next to Vermont. A news source wouldn’t say “upstate New York” if they’re talking about the whole west side of the state, which is on the complete opposite axis of upstate New York. Be for real
heres more sources since you want to call mine BS https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/wrong-person-identified-in-cornell-rape-lawsuit-marines-family-gets-death-threats/ar-AA2dlC21 https://www.stripes.com/branches/marine_corps/2026-10-02/marine-mistaken-identity-23033754.html https://townhall.com/news/mattvespa/2026/10/02/how-the-cornell-rape-story-led-to-this-family-being-tormented-by-the-online-mob-n2683985
i’m confused and its hard because to me belmont is still upstate NY. if you look it up you see some people split it into west central and north and others just call it all upstate. the best way to precaution it is to not send death threats to a family we don’t even know did anything
I never sent any fucking death threats. I proved the other person wrong and you just jumped in acting like you knew exactly what we were talking about, but you completely confused my whole point. and no, people don’t call west New York “upstate New York” I have lived in two different states (including in the south) and never heard anybody say that ever.
You sent the article for what reason? I was asking number nine if they had any proof that OP gave the wrong address. Then you sent an article which doesn’t even say what part of New York the family was even from. So I looked further into it, found out they are from upstate New York, and proved that this is the right address considering that it’s on the west side of New York, not the east. That’s literally all.
Humans ain’t stoves. They can act like your friend/partner, burn you, & still give the sense of comfort, safety, & healing you crave after being burned. If humans feel disrespected/used by someone they like, they often try to bring out behaviors in the other that reassure them they aren’t seen as less than human. It’s called “fawning,” & it’s a common trauma/fear response to sexual abuse/coercion, esp in femme victims, & esp when vic are still in denial.
"No because you don't go back to the thing that hurts you" is an objectively incorrect statement that exposes your elementary level of knowledge on this subject. It takes on average 7 attempts for a person to leave an abusive relationship for good according to numerous studies. People *frequently* return to the things or people that hurt them. Did you not read the part about the brain not fully functioning under trauma? Or are you just willfully ignoring it?
TBH, this is valid. I’m instinctively unsympathetic, but legitimately innocent people can get killed for this or caught in the crossfire. That being said, vigilantism/mob justice wouldn’t be a thing in this day & age of the justice system did wtf it was supposed to. It does not. Now randos on the internet can be judge jury & executioner simply bc policy makers never have victims in mind.
what i said applies to any gender. **you** are the one guilty of trying to gender my criticisms. the fact that you (regardless of gender) are insinuating that women aren't thinking for themselves because they disagree is disgusting and pathetic, and you're a fucking rape apologist! see how it doesn't matter how you identify or what's between your legs? you are only a modicum better than actual rapists
Possibly bc men in Girl Talk have already demonstrated they don’t care about violating women’s safe spaces. Couple that w the knowledge that he’s been accused of something himself, whilst also poking holes in a potential rape victims testimony (one that most women here personally empathize with)— why in the Holy Mary Mother of FUCK wouldn’t he get dragged?