
people in the comment freaking out that this is shaming is insane. post never said anything was bad - if it’s easy for someone to get in your pants, it’s easy for you to get into theirs - both ways. if you’re assuming that’s a bad thing, that’s quite literally your own fault for assigning a negative connotation to that trait. the only people slut shaming here are the ones assuming that someone being “easy” to have sex with is shameful
ok so whats the politically correct way to describe someone who frequently has sex with people they barely know? bc all OP is saying is that in that situation both people are equally easy. they can also be equally [insert special nice word that gets the stick out of your ass] but the word isnt the point - the point is that the onus for consensual sex should be on both the man and the woman and i feel like you’re purposefully ignoring that
Easy inherently implies persuasion is involved when you look at how the term is defined and used. when most of the time two people just want to have consensual sex with each other. And someone who sleeps with someone on the first date once doesn’t mean they frequently do it? It’s a lot of assumptions being made like with other forms of slut shaming. Why does there have to be a pc term for it? Simply who cares?