Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
actually they’re both easy. two peas in an easy pod. one in the same. idk why people can’t grasp that 😭😂
This post is unavailable
upvote 8 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

We’re really calling woman easy for having sex on the first date?

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

people in the comment freaking out that this is shaming is insane. post never said anything was bad - if it’s easy for someone to get in your pants, it’s easy for you to get into theirs - both ways. if you’re assuming that’s a bad thing, that’s quite literally your own fault for assigning a negative connotation to that trait. the only people slut shaming here are the ones assuming that someone being “easy” to have sex with is shameful

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

if you can read I said neither is easier than the other. one in the same

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

You said they’re both easy. Which includes women?

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

and it also includes the man so fucking what

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Yeah and it’s still calling women easy for sleeping on the first date even if you include men

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

yea. he is too. again, so what

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

I just don’t think anyone’s “easy” for sleeping on the first date. It’s slut shaming

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

by the literal definition of easy, you definitely are if you sleep with people you just met. slut shaming would be calling you a hoe for doing so.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

brother if you read the post it’s referring to men and women equally - no SHAME in it being easy, but if you’re giving some rando sex on the first link, easy is the only word for it. it definitely wasn’t difficult

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

you’re thinking logically they don’t do that around here 😂😂

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

Easy is another word for slut, whore. You make a judgment claim that “they’re easy for men to sleep with” as if they can’t make the choice for themselves. “Requiring little effort” like op said

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

ok so whats the politically correct way to describe someone who frequently has sex with people they barely know? bc all OP is saying is that in that situation both people are equally easy. they can also be equally [insert special nice word that gets the stick out of your ass] but the word isnt the point - the point is that the onus for consensual sex should be on both the man and the woman and i feel like you’re purposefully ignoring that

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

Easy inherently implies persuasion is involved when you look at how the term is defined and used. when most of the time two people just want to have consensual sex with each other. And someone who sleeps with someone on the first date once doesn’t mean they frequently do it? It’s a lot of assumptions being made like with other forms of slut shaming. Why does there have to be a pc term for it? Simply who cares?

upvote 1 downvote