Anonymous #4 13w

It’s just in evolutionary nature for breast to be sexualized by the male species

-18

Anonymous #4 13w

Tbh it’s slightly good bc it’s them willingly exposing themselves

3

Anonymous OP 13w

right?! and men are in every single chat they’re not supposed to be in bc of their weird fetishes, like they be creeping in girl talk, girl gamers, girl gym, and in the LESBIANS group 🤦‍♀️

1

Anonymous #4 13w

evolution in humans is like how are bodies, brains, and teeth have gotten smaller over time. and how some people never have wisdom teeth because people get them removed. and people’s feet have becoming flatter and toe nails are becoming thinner because of shoes

3

Anonymous #6 13w

Not you defending people who sexualize breasts🥴 It is only sexual if you make it sexual. Sometimes it’s so easy to spot males in Girl Talk.

1

Anonymous #9 9w

I just hopped back on here and found that a lot of people are disagreeing with my statement. That’s fair. I don’t mind discourse…but shaming me for it is uncalled for. Anyway, we read a book called pornography and sexual representation by Joesph W Slade in my psychology class:

-1

Anonymous #6 9w

The expert follows: “Unlike social constructionists, evolutionary biologists insist that well-developed human breasts are an evolutionary ploy, a redundant form of sexual coding in that they give the male more than one chance to be aroused” Take what you want with that, but it’s just something that I have researched myself. I’m a girl btw

0

Anonymous #6 9w

there are trends with what is sexualized in different times woman’s ankles used the be super sexualized and inappropriate to show during that time women’s breast were not sexualized at all now people would never even view or think of a woman’s ankle in a sexual way, but now breast are this is clearly not evolutionary, both ankles and breast are NOT A SEXUAL BODY PART both have nothing to do with sex and both have a purpose for the human body men sexualizing women’s breast is just a trend

1

Anonymous #6 9w

the human brain is very imaginative and incredibly INFLUENTIAL one man started sexualizing something and then started sharing with with his buddies/creating media and that blows up and other men see it and become influenced on that kink/fetish and then men use their weird sexual desires in fantasies and then search for that in real life sexualizing women because of what they’ve seen and been thinking of

2

Anonymous #4 9w

I can agree that there is a strong argument for sexualization by cultural constructs. Trends evolve and change. However it doesn’t make sense that ankles were found sexual but not breasts- during the Victorian era this idea was most popular but breasts were most definitely also sexualized - albeit in a more complex and contradictory way.

1

Anonymous #6 9w

idk what you’ve heard about that time, but it was completely normal to even show off breast without there being anything sexual it was seen as simply pure beauty if you look at the paintings from that time there is no sexualization just it’s simply showing the pure beauty of the human body but at the time ankles were not supposed to be shown in public it was considered very inappropriate, there are nude paintings showing the ankle bc they wanted to capture the full beauty of the human body

1

Anonymous #6 9w

there was an interview on a tribe where all the members did not cover anything above the waist they only covered their sexual body parts the interviewer asked the chief why the women did not cover their breast, and the chief asked “it is the babies food, why would you sexualize the babies food? the breast have nothing to do with sex, the purpose is just to feed babies”

1

Anonymous #6 9w

it is not normal nor evolutionary for the human brain to sexualize something that is not made for sex, it is simply influence that is becoming more normalized due to porn if it doesn’t make sense to you why people back then didn’t sexualize breast, why is it that there’s a tribe right now clean from the influence of media and porn to not sexualize a woman’s breast which simply EXISTS ONLY for food for babies? that clearly shows it’s not evolutionary

1