
people still have to fight and still die in war no matter if theyre war criminals or not. its a job that has to be done and its a day to honor those who have died and served. nobodys begging you to celebrate, but not every soldier is a war criminal and they deserve a day of respect.
I don’t get why we can’t simultaneously condemn the mass bombing campaigns and killings while still acknowledging that what we protected in the South ended up being better than the north, at least long term. There were countless good people who had nothing to do with those specific missions.
I mean that’s cool but the USSR is the one who deserves credit for defeating the Nazis. We were on their side until they got too ambitious. And then after WWII we recruited them here to run our government programs. So we’re not anti Nazi whatsoever. We actually inspired them in the first place
Yes, I agree. But in doing so, look at the economic and quality of life differences between the two. But look how much more prosperous the south is than the north. Does our sanctions have a lot to do with that? Sure. But they were pretty equivalent up until the death of Il Sung. After that their internal government style went extremely repressive and lost support of China and Russia.
That question only works when the US is the only power in the region. We were effectively the 3rd most effective power in the region. Strongest overall maybe. But half a world away. China and USSR were neighbors and kept the north prosperous for a time. Until the government went fully authoritarian.
Systematic human rights abuses, lack of free elections, hereditary rule. Too much text to fully explain, I’d need an essay And every state cracks down on dissent that threatens the livelihood of the state. Not ideal in a perfect world but when you have the US couping every country that doesn’t bow down to them, it’s no wonder. You could argue that they go overboard but you have to look at in the context of our continued war and genocide of them and what they have to do to survive in response
We can agree on the dubious history of U.S. interventions, economic sanctions, and the devastating impact of the Korean War. We can also agree on the fact that being surrounded by hostile superpowers shapes a nation’s security posture and economy. We can also agree that the U.S. certainly suffers from political dynasties (Bushes, Clintons, Kennedys, etc.) and oligarchic influence.
But your statements are full of false equivalencies. U.S. political dynasties exist due to wealth and networking, which is structurally different from North Korea, where political power is legally and constitutionally bound to a single family line by blood. Plus, in the U.S., people can and do protest, organize strikes, and criticize the president without facing state-sanctioned execution or generational labor camps.