i don't like it for several reasons, but a big one is safety. You never know if that person is running from somebody dangerous, whether that be abusive family member/ex, a stalker, or even as extreme as they're in WITSEC. Ik those are kind of extreme but we really never know, there's no indicators. And if you film them is a well known place, and the dangerous person sees it and identifies the place, it's easier for them to distinguish the area that person is in and puts them in greater danger
I mean… I disagree for the sole reason being: that means I can’t video an abuser or someone committing a crime or a boss hitting on me, etc. not being able to record something without everyone’s consent effects a lot more than just people being photographed while walking or in the back of a photo. Legally it’s going to protect more bad people than punish anyone. Unless the law is like “no photography with malicious intent or use” like multiple photos of the same person (stalking) or something.