Anonymous #2 1d

like I JUST saw a post where people were saying it wasn’t sexual harassment to have sex in your bedroom while your roommate’s sleeping there. people don’t know what these things are, it’s infuriating

43

all of them

23

also why does that matter? why is that the first thing you ask? men of every race rape and abuse women

17

Anonymous #5 1d

yeah bc centuries of oppression and poverty and colonization definitely had nothing to do with this. do you even care about the women being raped in these areas? or the people being killed? or do you just want to be racist?

32

Anonymous #5 1d

what’s your excuse for most school shooters and family annihilators being white men? since you wanna ignore everything i’m saying anyway

29

Anonymous #1 1d

Not that oppression isn’t a horrible thing, but Thailand, Japan, and Liberia were never colonized and all three turned out quite differently. South America was primary colonized by Catholics etc… it does seem to have some effect, but the causal link as the sole reason for a nation doing poorly does not appear to exist.

1

Anonymous #4 1d

all three of those countries suffered under severe foreign influence tbf

5

Anonymous #1 1d

That one is also a specified data set. Again, while the numbers appear heavy in one direction, it still doesn’t create a complete causal link between skin color and propensity towards violence. I would tell you what does, but the world doesn’t seem to be ready for that conversation yet (it’s not racial).

4

Anonymous #2 1d

That’s true. The longer a nation exists the more likely it’s going to have foreign influence especially since the Industrial Revolution. There are very few untouched cultures left in the world.

1

Anonymous #5 1d

listing a bunch of attacks with zero statistics lmao

19

Anonymous #5 1d

also, “the first World Trade Center attack were by Muslims” like no shit, the US gave violent extremists guns then directly antagonized them. it was our government’s utter incompetence that caused it, but sure, blame an entire people for a small group.

17

Anonymous #2 1d

You realize that’s the other side of the coin in the overarching argument being made. To blame all men, including the men who would kill the rapists, is blaming an entire group of people for a small group.

-4

Anonymous #5 1d

You’re right in the US there is a very specific group doing most of the SA. White American men. And I tried to find a world wide one but there’s no tracking data for that

8

Anonymous #5 1d

What’s schrodingers breakfast?

1

Anonymous #6 1d

This isn’t a SA specific data breakdown, it’s all sexual offenses, and I would be willing to bet #5 is going to make the per capita argument. If I had to deep dive all sexual offenses data… actually nvm I’ll just ask the AI to run the numbers.

-2

Anonymous #6 1d

Well that’s something I wasn’t aware of. Seems like the white male perverts are combated by Chris Hanson types whereas Native American’s somehow account for most of the rape cases? That has to heavy because the jurisdiction of native land is covered by the federal government.

1

Anonymous #4 1d

Or at least “largely in part that native land is covered by the federal government*”

1

Anonymous #5 1d

And there’s WAYYYYY more that are white Christian’s. What’s your point?

15

Anonymous #8 1d

posting random shit then refusing to elaborate

19

Anonymous #2 1d

Idk seems kinda relative. This is one of the first times anyone has posted details of the case to Yikyak I’ve seen yet.

5

Anonymous #4 1d

it sheds light on barely anything at best, and it’s a red herring at worst. sharing unimportant details with no explanation actively detracts from the discussion.

11

Anonymous #2 1d

If I was a criminal investigator assigned this case, and that was part of her testimony, it would be near impossible for me to get a conviction for aggravated rape. I could potentially still get a charge to stick for sexual assault, but additional details and who the jury was would be critical factors.

6

Anonymous #4 1d

consenting to one person isnt the same as consenting to all of them, also she was severely under the influence 😭 she could not consent. this part is still irrelevant when she did not consent. I imagine #2 only posted it because he finds the gay part funny. I doubt he’s put much thought into it.

21

Anonymous #2 1d

She consented to multiple threesomes. And consented to more after that night with the same people. But sure she was raped and the Cornell 7 deserve to have their lives ruined

-7

Anonymous #8 1d

you cannot consent under the influence it’s that easy

18

Anonymous #4 1d

Wait sorry what’s the difference?

12

Anonymous OP 1d

Depends on if it’s state or federal but last time the broad study between the two was done and reported back to us, “sexual assault included an attempt of penetration however slight” where as battery was unwanted/undesired/non-consensual contact with a sexual body part. Simple battery would just be contact like grabbing someone by the wrist to prevent them from leaving, or shoving someone.

18

Anonymous #1 1d

yeah its not rape and race, its culture. just have to look back at how many different cultures see rape

1

Anonymous #10 1d

“Is sexual assault sexual assault in this situation” yes. Dense asf

15

Anonymous #10 1d

Could potentially get a sexual battery charge if yall were both fully clothed and the defense attorney made the argument there was no possible way you could be penetrated. Open’s the perpetrator up to having his junk examined. If yall were both naked, could be sexual assault. Communal shower type situation.

8

Anonymous #6 1d

i’m just asking geez

11

Anonymous #4 1d

yeah it happened a few years ago, can’t do anything about it now.

4

Anonymous #10 1d

My bad. Sounded at first like all these smart ass men in the comments. If that happened to you then yeah I would consider that SA bc it’s physical but #4 is right they could do Secual harassment

8

Anonymous #12 1d

So i guess we can’t read? Because the two things that I said were rape are legally classified as rape and the other things I mentioned, I clarified it was sexual assault or harassment. And i was saying most of the men who have done those things are being forced to realize it was rape/SA/SH.

13

Anonymous #12 1d

As a rape victim and someone who has good reading comprehension OP said nothing offensive

11

Anonymous #6 1d

Ty 🫶

13

Anonymous #13 15h

As an undergrad there was one where a girl made a claim thinking the spot she made the claim wasn’t on camera to make a guy feel guilty for not walking her home. University police knew right away. More recently, a claim was made about a guy who was 800 miles away when the claim was made. I guess they thought he wouldn’t be able to refute it? The punishment for rape should be death. But the punishment for bearing false witness is the same punishment that would have been levied had an innocent 1/2

1

Anonymous #4 15h

2/2 person been convicted on the basis of that witness statement contributing to their conviction.

1

Anonymous OP 13h

it entirely comes down to jurisdiction. some jurisdictions don't even have rape charges to offer. some would call something sexual assault and others would call it battery. usually battery is the physical action, and assault is the actions leading to it (causing fear, terror, apprehension, discomfort)

1