Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
There’s one thing about the Clancy case rn that’s so odd to me. All the men pissy that people are actually questioning the cops and the prosecution are literally the same fuckers who will vow “innocent until proven guilty” if it’s about rape
upvote 43 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 6w

Fun fact, I’m not arguing with people who don’t understand what you have to do to actually get a conviction or don’t know how these cases are actually set up OR how confessions are used in cases bc if you think that’s the end all be all of a case you really shouldn’t be commenting on this

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 6w

the trial isn’t about whether she killed the kids. that’s already been stipulated to. it’s about the insanity the plea, that’s why all the questioning by the defense is about her mental state and the possibility of psychosis. and why the defense objected to the introduction of the autopsy photos into evidence

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6w

Ntm that wasn’t the convo but anyways. 1. You need to account for who the confession is to 2. False confessions 3. If someone is mentally sound enough for their confession to hold weight etc. please pay attention to actually court cases before saying some bs to me, I don’t have time

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

That’s not what the people I’m talking about are arguing

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6w

that’s because they don’t understand the proceedings on a fundamental level. you’re wasting your time arguing with people who don’t know the basic facts about the trial

upvote 1 downvote