Anonymous #1 1d

hamburgers are not essential. there are plenty of other foods, and plenty of other less-wasteful meats

7

Anonymous #1 1d

there are no other unique environmental issues with ai, and the social issues will not be avoided by a couple thousand people choosing to abstain from it

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

I’m not going to continue to argue because this is bait. Goodbye

10

Anonymous #1 1d

you cant call anything you dont like bait lmao😭😭. nothing i said wasnt true

-3

Anonymous #1 1d

like ik its popular or whatever to have this belief about ai, but check your own sources. if ur so sure ur right then please, inform me. i barely use ai and am more than willing to stop if i hear an actual good case as to why. and i do mean that. i dont try to argue i just speak very matter of fact because i have autism and i care about objective statements

-3

Anonymous OP 1d

Then why are you pro AI instead of anti beef? If this is the only statistic you care about (which as I said, AI causes A LOT of other issues) you should be more concerned about beef alternatives than using it to justify AI usage

16

Anonymous #1 1d

i never said i was pro ai or anti beef. i just want to correct a false narrative some people have. people will yell at one person for doing like 3 chat gpt prompts, then go eat a hamburger and think they’re an environmentalist the negative reaction im getting rn tells me a lot too (and i dont mean from u). it tells me people dont care about the actual effect of their actions they care about the mainstream image of it all

-1

Anonymous OP 22h

That may not be your intention but that’s what people see. You are getting a negative response because many people see this as you promoting the use of ai, a system known for stealing art and ideas without credit and contributing to kids not being able to write a paragraph by themselves. Comparing ChatGPT and hamburgers based on water usage alone might as well be comparing apples and oranges.

1