Anonymous OP 3w

I’m also not at all talking about in rape cases. That does not count. I’m taking abt people who both consent to having sex without protection or very little protection.

6

Anonymous #1 3w

Did you see someone’s post abt my post….bro apparently not 😭

3

Anonymous #2 3w

That is true, however if you use more than one. Such as the morning after and condoms it’s EXTREMELY unlikely. Another thing is, people who have sex know the consequences. At the end of the day, if you can’t handle those consequences don’t have sex.

-3

Anonymous OP 3w

no I didn’t but not surprised. these bitches don’t do shit but play victim

5

Anonymous #1 3w

Ts so real. Like me and my use protection but we both know mine is not 100% effective cause of my other meds. But we know if I get pregnant we having it.

1

Anonymous OP 3w

every time this convo comes up we really have to kick it back to 6th grade sex ed like pregnancy is 100% avoidable I cannot stand people that treat it like it’s a cold

2

Anonymous OP 3w

girl there are couples that have gotten pregnant after a literal vasectomy

14

Anonymous #3 3w

I mean it’s not giving up your body. Ur prob gonna get mad at me for saying this but women were made to have children. And speaking of car crashes, only stupid people get behind the wheel drunk. If you are stupid enough to do something you know you shouldn’t, you deserve to deal with the consequences. Simple. Expecally when it can be so preventable

-2

Anonymous OP 3w

that’s great for you but if someone else is doing exactly what you do and happen to get pregnant, having an abortion is their choice

4

Anonymous #2 3w

And again. You know the risks. Wear a condom. Wrap it up.

-4

Anonymous OP 3w

“something you know you shouldn’t” and it’s just having sex 😭

13

Anonymous OP 3w

if women were made to have children why do we go through menopause? why do we not just die as soon as we’re not able to have children anymore? why do you think capability = purpose? and yes, stupid people make stupid choices all the time. but regardless of the stupidity of an action, they still cannot be forced to donate any part of their body to save another person. the ONLY time people think that’s reasonable is when it comes to pregnancy

6

Anonymous #2 3w

No. That shouldn’t be an option. Because yk what, I know the repercussions and I will live with it. It’s not hard to not have sex or wrap it up.

-1

Anonymous OP 3w

it is an option and women have been getting abortions for thousands of years in one way or another. what another woman does with their body couldn’t possibly be any less of your business

2

Anonymous #3 3w

Babes. We have our periods at a certain time for a reason. It shows we are ready to have healthy babies. Menopause means we are past the age of having healthy babies. And idk abt you, but I wouldn’t be here today without women giving birth. Without them doing their duity. I mean idk abt you but from what I know only women can have children. It’s also not donate. Because it is you. A child is a part of you.

-2

Anonymous OP 3w

if we’re going solely based on biology, then i’m literally going to have sex with your partner and let him knock me up. that’s what would happen in the wild babe

6

Anonymous OP 3w

duty is crazyyyy if i got pregnant i would k*ms. now two people are dead instead of one. bit silly innit? #prolife

3

Anonymous #2 3w

I mean you can try but he dont want you. And in the wild babes, animals still chose their mates, they dont js go fuck whoever.

-1

Anonymous OP 3w

you didn’t answer my question. if women are MEANT to have children, why do we exist past the point of childbearing years? why do you think it’s a woman’s duty to have children? why are parents not legally required to donate anything to their children once they are born, then, if it’s not donation if you share DNA with that person?

2

Anonymous #2 3w

Ok? I mean it’s not hard to wrap it up. You don’t want kids? Don’t have sex.

-2

Anonymous OP 3w

almost no mammals are monogamous babe. it’s a human social construct

6

Anonymous #2 3w

the only reason your bf doesn’t fuck every hot girl he sees is because society told him he shouldn’t

8

Anonymous #3 3w

Who else would raise the child? Who would take care of the child and feed them? And I think it’s a women’s duity because we are the only ones who can have children. It is our duity to continue the population. I mean, if you decided to let ur child die, CPS can be called babes.

-1

Anonymous #2 3w

Mmm no. More because he only likes people who have the same opinion as him. Women should provide kids and take care of the men.

-1

Anonymous #2 3w

Sorry that you think every man has to love you

-1

Anonymous #2 3w

They may not be, but they don’t mate with anyone and everyone they see

-1

Anonymous OP 3w

hmm i don’t know maybe the men? i feel like i already know your answer but if you really truly think that’s a woman’s duty then how do you explain the fact i am a lesbian and im never having children. because im never having sex with a man. also… yeah? cps can be called? but if your child needs a lung transplant and a parent COULD donate, they are not FORCED to

1

Anonymous #3 3w

I mean babes. You can have kids without a man….theres artificial insemination, adoption, surrogate. You can have kids. Just because you don’t wanna dosnt mean you can’t. They aren’t forced to, but if they refuse to give their child something that will cause them to die, they probably would get arrested. And also every gay person I have met has some sort of mental issue so I mean idk something could be linked there. I’m not saying I’m homophobic but js making an observation

4

Anonymous OP 3w

ok first. wrongggggggg

1

Anonymous OP 3w

i mean babes. a man is still required for that. babes where does the sperm come from. babes

1

Anonymous #3 3w

I mean it all depends on where you are.

0

Anonymous OP 3w

ok then show me somewhere you can be arrested for that

1

Anonymous #3 3w

Yes, but you don’t have to fuck a man. You don’t even gotta talk to a man.

3

Anonymous OP 3w

then how am i a lesbian? if women were truly truly made to have children, why would nature allow something that means i am not sexually attracted to men and will have to go through 1000 extra steps to have a child? why aren’t women able to asexually reproduce, if our only role is to have children?

2

Anonymous OP 3w

you are actually insane. you know that right?

3

Anonymous #2 3w

Awww thanks!! 😊

-1

Anonymous OP 3w

hey quick question since you don’t wanna answer my other ones: do you also think it’s a woman’s duty to die from ovarian cancer because between men and women we’re the only ones that can do that? or does that logic only apply to what you want it to

3

Anonymous #3 3w

you ate

6