
since ig he took his comment down or something: this just in: man discovers the concept of consent. women on OF are consenting to be sexualized. women not on OF are not consenting to be sexualized. this is basic logical reasoning my guy. and also; supply and demand. with no demand there would be no one willing to supply. we all love capitalism until a woman uses it to supplement income on the pretense of preexisting sexualization of her body. jfc youâre dense.
This admission is a double-edged take because on one hand: itâs a man admitting that he cannot trust his brothers, and two: itâs you admitting that you are giving into/entertaining these sorts of men that, conveniently enough, were the first for you to distrust (meaning you distrusted men before your man did)
so youâre saying you need to worry about guys befriending women why? cause theyâll sexualize them and be a concern. right. so thatâs the point. men and women can be friends platonically if men arenât weird but even men know men are sexual most of the time do women canât befriend them
They know thereâs a massive market for it. Capitalizing off of their bodies isnât exactly a choice . Ppl who need money have been doing that for centuries. It doesnât make it right . Their mental health suffers and theyâre not happy. Those who do it and cope w it by playing into the role MEN WANT . Itâs still about men . They succumb to the sexualization and to COPE , pretend itâs empowering
Okay ya she could obviously . Thatâs what feminists like me believe . Men canât watch certain vids and pictures of women donât provide that . And itâll help improve the dehumanization and objectification of women. BUT that doesnât solve oversexualization . They used magazines, before that, girls showing their ankles..it doesnât matter what girls do if guys live w a certain dehumanizing over-sexualizing mindset .
Being attracted to a girl wearing revealing clothes is perfectly normal. That does not mean you have an overly-sexualized brain. It is perfectly normal for a man to be attractive to a women who's naked or wearing revealing clothes, its biology. What is not normal is women posting themselves naked, and wearing extremely immodest clothes in public. Modesty is importantly. (Also I am not saying that it's the woman's fault for dressing that way if she gets raped, it's 100% on the man.)
Okay but if u remember , we were talking about men talking to women in normal settings. Women talk to men who are in relationships and it doesnât mean theyâre trying to get w them.. men just assume that bc itâs projection . What Iâve noticed is they canât be normal ab women anymore . Itâs an overwhelming amount of sexualization no matter what. Even if sheâs dressed modestly . They sexualize that too. Itâs a mental illness
and u keep mentioning sexualization and men biologically wired for that. Fine but what were all talking about how men OVER sexualize women (like ur doing) to the degree that they canât even have a causal non platonic conversation/relationship w out their being undertones or the assumption that something sexual will happen. This is unethical and UNNATURAL.
BRO LET IT GO. U DONT belong here bc this is girl talk and ur a man. And yes ur right, women do like sex but both men and women shouldn't OVERSEXUALIZE. That's when we fall into dehumanizing objectification territory and society cant survive like that . Look at menâs SA /murder stats against women How about how men act when a man gets SA'd. They over sexualize women and assume it wasn't assault cuz the man must have liked it. men don't look past a women's boobs to see her heart that's dangero
Asexual men exist. Gay men exist. Men who do not see every relationship with women as sexual/romantic exist. If you want to remind everyone that ânot all menâ sexualize every woman, you canât assume that every M/F friendship is secretly non-platonic, and therefore automatically have a problem with your GF having male friends.
Hey so you know what consent is right? Some women consent to being sexualized in specific scenarios. Some men (ânot all menâ) see some women whoâve consented to being sexualized, & assume therefore, all women are/want to be sexualized by men. If youâre the type to say not all men, but assume M/F friendships are non-platonic for the above reasons, youre the type of man women complain about.
U deleted ur comment to change the narrative and act innocent . Iâm crying . u kept calling ppl idiots and cursing u keep missing the point no matter how much we explain. weâre taking about CONSENT and OVER sexualization . U just donât get it. Maybe the call is coming from inside the house and u need to examine ur beliefs .
promise you every man is like this. why do you think every good and kind father is worried of who their daughter dates? i am friends with more women then men because i am a good person and i make women feel safe around me. i still have thoughts that i push away. itâs biological. sorry.
having sexual thoughts are biological ,fine. But over-sexualization is cultural . And acting on that is a choice . And if u have too many sexual thoughts, thatâs a personal issue to fix . Bc that is actually not normal. Examine why this is happening men are socialized to think ab sex too much and this objectifies women and this dehumanization of women is perpetuated by other men and puts women into genuine danger .
Iâm not saying having the emotions in itself are the problem Iâm saying emotions can lead to emotional decisions Iâve always thought âemotional cheatingâ is bs. As soon as you take attraction and combine it with feelings you can have messy results. Both parties need to be able to push that aside and maintain a friendship. No guy wants to meet her friends and run into Josh John Jacob jack just like a girl dosenât want to meet Ryleigh Kyleigh and Kayleigh
So what to you is emotional infidelity. Iâve never really been big on that cause to me sex should be the most emotional thing you could possibly do with another person. Personally Iâd rather a girl crying to a guy friend or vice versa rather than getting a sheâs busy bro text
I am a dude. I was confused as fuck when âfor the girlsâ popped up on my yik yak lmao. Iâm just here trynna learn. I guess it is different for women not wanting your boyfriend crying to another woman especially because for most men theyâve only really cried infront of a select number of women so I can see it being offensive that youâre choosing another no family member over you
bro genuinely go fuck yourself. I am trying my best not to comment on this thread as a dude, but holy fucking shit NO. dms off, this isnât pick-me bullshit. NO. You are a freak. Stop telling yourself this is normal and see somebody. If you tell your future sons that this is normal, holy shit. I promise you every man is not like this. hearing you say âwomen feel safe around meâŠâ makes me terrified for the women in your life. It is not biological. There is hope for you.
I am a biologist. Firstly, women have testosterone in our bodies and secondly, itâs not normal to think of having sex with someone for having breasts. Itâs a taught social trait, donât fucking tell me that your social cues are biological. You have no fucking clue what you are talking about you perv
Biologically there in no hormone to make you sexualize someone and think about having sex with them for existing. That is a taught trait. This is biology 101, Iâm also debunking your claim because if you say testosterone does that, then women on their period should be acting like you, but we donât, because weâre not fucking psychopaths. But great misogyny at the end after claiming youâre not being a misogynist bastard you proved yourself wrong
No sorry my feed has been full of the cornel crap so that was js on my mind, my apologies. Not all men think or do the same, but all men are wired the same way to want females. Not all men are disgustingly and vile but all men have the capacity so thatâs not a chance a protector would want to take
âWired the same way to want femalesâ so um no. Thatâs not a thing. You are wired to want females the way females are wired to want males. You are confusing the societal issues with biological fact. If you are really saying itâs a biological trait to be a rapist, you should commit yourself into a psych ward, or 6 ft under
âI know how all men thinkâ if you say this and go âwell not all menâ do you not see the problem that you just said???? The reason itâs all men is because ALL men hold up this systemic problem and ALL men are capable. Yet women are still bashed and literally assaulted for saying that all men are capable so it is all men.
The same could go for women. All women can rape a child so all women are rapist. Now how about all women are like Lindsey Clancy, and will strangle their children you canât make a broad claim based off of one incident not all men are rapist same as how all mothers donât kill their children, but they all could. You canât make a broad generalization off of one thing
God forbid women are cautious around all men because 1 in every 4 women are assaulted and over 90% of perpetrators are men. If I gave you a 2 bucket of snakes and one bucket had venomous snakes would you shove your hands in both? Clearly one is fucking safe. Why donât you know better? Itâs not all snakes you dumb bitch
Itâs every man in the world is a rapist and murder? Every single one of them? Or in that category 90% of the charged parties are men. How many times are men raped but too ashamed to say something about it. Just because 90% of murderers and rapist are men does not mean that every man is a rapist and a murderer.
Then why would you say that itâs all snakes even if itâs not all snakes some snakes are venomous some snakes arenât itâs your choice whether you put your hand in the bucket, itâs also your choice, whether you lie and say all of the snakes are venomous. Youâre making a broad claim grouping everyone in with a small selection of vile people.
So back to the original saying, itâs not all men, but itâs always a man, now that sounds a bit closer to what youâre getting at. You canât differentiate between the men, but itâs not every man but you know itâs going to be a man. Thatâs why the saying is what it is. You canât just say every man is a horrible person js because one man is.
about you point of 90% of SA is men. using the snake anology imagine you put a bunch of snakes in a bucket and out of all of them 5% are venomous . 90% of the time you put your hand in the 5% of the snakes bite you. does that mean snakes will bite you 90% of the time or does it only apply to 5% of the snakes? you have to account for repeat offenders. the kind of people who will do that are the people who will do it again. that doesnât mean all snakes are bad. it means you should demonize venom
Okay so shove your hand into a bucket with venomous and non venomous snakes. Do it. Yeah the venomous snakes will hospitalize you or kill you but youâre just being a dramatic bitch. Yeah you canât tell which snake is which but you should still shove your hand into the bucket with venomous snakes.
hold on take a step back. clearly i struck a nerve. im have been SAâd before by a woman. she looked like every other woman. should i say ânot all women but mostâ or âitâs all womenâ or should i recognize that a small percentage of women do that. same with men. most men that SA are repeat offenders. you canât tell the difference and i understand that fear. but not every mosquito has malaria.
If you have a problem w the âall menâ phrase (which isnât even literal when used within this context), or generalizations made about men on principle, you donât get to say dumb shit like âall men want females the same way.â Are they or are they not a monolith? Pick a goddamn lane.