Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download

default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

genuinely they could spare that much & they wouldnt even bat an EYE like its just pocket change to them

upvote 46 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

Literally not on of them would have ANY negative impact to their lives for doing so, even multiple times over. Nobody, not a SINGLE person, should have that much. At all. Ever. For ANY reason.

upvote 37 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

Remember net worth is not the same thing as money in the bank yall. They’re still ungodly rich but net worth is the total assets as well

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

this is obviously untrue. 2024 federal spending on SNAP alone was nearly $100 billion

upvote -10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 7w

Being on SNAP doesn’t equate to starving, though. Most of it is to support those at or below the poverty line but also many above it as well. The majority of SNAP is used to support kids, elderly, and disabled folks (who are constantly discriminated against in job searching). The $25b estimate also comes with policy changes, only partly contributing to programs like SNAP, like corrective measure to ensure improved/more stable income, access to more and healthier foods, farm support, etc.

upvote 19 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 7w

if we spend four times your number on just one food aid program and hunger isn’t solved then your number is bullshit

upvote -8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 7w
post
upvote 24 downvote