Ok? Good for you man. But you know what’s even more objectively true? Not regurgitating gymtok absolutes. Sure, is 5-8 reps a physiologically optimal system for most people? Yeah. But does it make it the best? Absolutely not. Optimal is not the best way to train. The best way to train is up to the individual and giving a broader range of freedom. That will always outweigh any TikTok study you recite
And cuz you’re gonna spew more nonsense backed up by Chris Beardsley studies and old Paul Carter posts about effective reps model and fatigue (which btw is mostly out of context anyways) and pawn it off as your own knowledge, here are practical scenarios as to why an individual might want to do more than 8 reps: injury/aggravation, noobs should experience training hard in higher rep ranges too, personal preferences, neurological adaptation, etc.
Yeah and unfortunately without him you would not be able to say exactly why you believe a 5-8 rep range is the baseline. You would realize that what you’re arguing is splitting hairs at most. And no, in most scenarios telling a gym noob to do 5 reps of a lat pulldown or concentration curl or whatever is not the default we should be pointing to. No one who was once a noob walked in to the gym and did 5 clean reps with heavy weights of multiple exercises without a coach. It’s just highly unlikely
Dude 6-12 rep range and a 5-8 is not that big of a difference, especially to a noob. And your degree doesn’t mean jack if everything you’re saying is literally straight off instagram posts. And btw, the bigger studies that look at atrophy rates and stuff, which is basically the backbone of your training system, was done on ICU patients who couldn’t move their body. What’s “optimal” is literally just a hairs worth better than most “suboptimal” practices.