
Describing a woman (a highly successful one at that) only by the relationship to a man is fully intentional. By wording it that way you reduce a woman to just an extension of her male counterpart when she is her own person with her own personality and achievements INDEPENDENT of her husband and they should be given the respect they deserve
I’m sure she is proud of him. The issue isn’t between the people in the relationship, it’s between women and how media chooses to talk about them. Think of it like this: Sally is dating/married to John John brings sally to a work party Sally introduces herself as sally (because that is her name) Everyone just calls her “The girl that John brought” all night This is incredibly oversimplified but what I’m saying is diminishing her to just her relationship is an intentional choice of words
Or because that how they know her? Like oh yeah your John’s wife Ive heard great things vice versa, oh yeah your salleys husband. Similarly someone might so oh yeah your such and such dad, or refer to a group/family as John and them. The Simone biles example is admittedly different because she is the more known person in the relationship, although I’m sure there are some people who know Johnathon Owens and not her, but in most cases you are doing this to relate it to someone u already know.
I don’t think it’s a matter of love. It’s a matter of identity. For example, that people are announced as Mr. And Mrs. John Smith and letters addressed to Mrs. John Smith as her identity. You can love someone and still be happy to be their spouse. But that doesn’t mean you want when you’re at work, or in the news to be known only as the spouse. You want people to know you for yourself, not your spouse. To be an individual person.