Anonymous #1 13w

lol you can keep em, I’ve shot weapons before, I’m sure I’m not missing anything

0

Anonymous OP 13w

I will be keeping them, thanks.

-1

Anonymous #1 13w

Okay can you get off my post now. You reek of gun owner

3

Anonymous OP 13w

Oh no do I scare you for supporting the 2nd amendment? 👻

-1

Anonymous #3 13w

Coming from someone in a hunting family who owns their own for hunting and has crafted their own opinions after getting a damn education^

5

Anonymous #3 13w

Bro it's a hobby like collecting cars or cards 😭😭 Also, it can be a genuine investment, like if you collect ammo and guns those things are likely to appreciate as assets over time, especially with market changes Lol

2

Anonymous stolas 13w

yeah the wrote that back when you had to load a bullet through the muzzle

7

Anonymous stolas 13w

Cars and stamps don’t fire high velocity items tho- guns were made for one thing and that is to injure people or animals. Cars are made to go places- big difference

11

Anonymous #3 13w

Say there comes a need for us to use firearms against the gov, should we fight their drones with muskets?

3

Anonymous #4 13w

Exactly! This was made far before the highly engineered killing machines we have now. Go ahead and collect all the muskets in the world idgaf, but these war machines people can just buy now? Not what the founding fathers meant.

2

Anonymous #3 13w

The founding fathers wrote it so that we could defend ourselves from a tyrannical government. It has nothing to do with the technology of the weapon itself. The second amendment protects every single other amendment from being ripped to shreds. Considering how often I see the left calling anyone right of center a fascist you’d think y’all would be a lot more inclined to own a firearm.

1

Anonymous #3 13w

You could not be more incorrect.

0

Anonymous #1 13w

You’d think you would understand history in context but apparently not. They also used guns to defend slavery so I don’t think it’s the flex you think. We protect our rights now bc we understand how to treat people better and how much it costs to piss off poor people —they didnt need guns for the french revolution-they had them but it didnt succeed because of it. Like the american revolution didnt succeed just bc people had muskets.

4

Anonymous #5 13w

Nothing a civilian can get can defend themselves from the governments weaponry. Dumbass

0

Anonymous #1 13w

Correct me?

-1

Anonymous #4 13w

Ah yes pulling out insults when I’m using big educated words. Yeah you’re right we won’t be able to fight drones with muskets- but I still don’t think we need anything more powerful than what is necessary for hunting.

-2

Anonymous #4 13w

That’s the point

3

Anonymous #3 13w

That’s the point. We shouldn’t.

0

Anonymous #4 13w

That’s the point. Repeal the NFA and all other unconstitutional restrictions. I should be able to own not only a purpose built select fire weapon, but also a damn rotary grenade launcher if I so please.

1

Anonymous #1 13w

It’s scary how some people want less autonomy against possible tyrants

1

Anonymous #5 13w

They want less autonomy against people they constantly call tyrants as well. How many times have you seen them call the current administration fascists? They’d be all about firearms if they actually believed their own lie.

1

Anonymous #4 13w

There’s so many wrong statements here I’m really trying to even figure out how to respond. The historical context is that the founding fathers wanted citizens to hold power against their government forever and always. As the governments weapons advance so should the citizens. The argument that the founding fathers didn’t know that firearm technology would advance with time is completely false. There were several repeating rifle designs around during the revolutionary war.

1

Anonymous #4 13w

As for slavery, yes the confederates used rifles to fight in the war, but so did the union. That’s how war works… Id also like to point out that slaves were able to be emancipated by fleeing to the union lines and were then able to join the union troops to fight against their oppressors. There couldn’t be a more clear example of why firearms are important in defending against oppression and tyranny.

1

Anonymous #4 13w

We haven’t protected our rights nearly as much as we should have as essentially every amendment has some law that limits it. Free speech zones, gun control, the patriot act, and civil asset forfeiture to name a few. The only reason we the people aren’t oppressed nearly as bad as other socialist countries such as Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela, and China is because of our firearms.

0

Anonymous #4 13w

The poor and middle class are still thrown aside especially in the US. You’re foolish to think otherwise and believe that those not in power shouldn’t have weapons to defend against their oppressors. Also the French Revolution was 100% fought with firearms so idk how you managed to pull that out of your ass. The American revolution succeeded because of brave men who stood and fought (with firearms) against the British monarchy.

0

Anonymous #1 13w

Wahwah wah. Too bad guns don’t kill enough bad people and idiots.

1