Anonymous #4 2w

Yea but can I get mine at Claire’s?

65

Anonymous #4 2w

I think as long as someone is 18 or older they can have that part of their body modified like how you can do other things. On babies, yeah let’s not do that at all

1

Anonymous #4 2w

There is no medical necessity for girls to have it. There is for boys. There is a significantly higher risk for boys to develop UTIs and STIs when they are NOT circumcised.

10

Anonymous #8 2w

there is no medical necessity to get circumcised, it makes cleaning ur dick marginally easier but the majority of the world is uncircumcised and does not suffer from this avalanche of issues that apparently uncircumcised people suffer from. There is no real medical reason to support everyone getting circumcised which is why no major medical body recommends the routine circumcision of males in a society that has access to running water, and before you come at me …I am a circumcised Jew btw.

10

Anonymous #8 2w

Yeah, when they aren’t taught to properly clean themselves, sure. Circumcision is very rarely needed and there needs to be more emphasis on properly bathing.

9

Anonymous evil_doer 2w

I’m sorry you were violated in two ways that day

16

Anonymous #8 2w

Antibiotics are used to treat UTIs, not irreversible genital surgery. Also; the issue is about Consent. Whether circumcision has hygienic benefits is irrelevant. (Europe, Asia, and South America do not circumcise) do you genuinely believe that over 70% of the males on earth have disgusting infected dicks? Stop rationalizing a non consentual modification of male genitals. It’s a violation of bodily autonomy.

12

Anonymous #8 2w

Circumcision only serves to make the make sexual experience less pleasurable. When someone does that to a baby it is doing real harm.

7