Anonymous #1 37w

if my balls are ice cream then lick em😭

232

Anonymous #2 37w

This got me crying 😭😭

39

Anonymous #1 37w

wow it’s almost like the comment against women is based in misogyny, biological misinformation, and advocacy against women’s rights!

85

the “roast beef” thing primarily came from incels online, who claim that labia stretch like that due to extensive sexual encounters. they use that as proof of “female degeneracy” and say it’s why women shouldn’t be allowed to choose who they have sex with. so when yall talk about “roast beef lips” that’s the company you’re keeping.

119

Anonymous #4 37w

Nobody says that bs anymore maybe younger people but when you get older don’t nobody give a fuck who you sleeping with or even care about you to be honest people are gonna keep picking on yall bc yall get offended easily if you are an easy target they won’t stop

17

Anonymous #1 37w

sorry for being offended by misogyny!

67

Boomer ass meme 🤢

36

Anonymous #4 37w

Blah blah blah

1

It’s not a bad thing. That’s the whole point. Pussy is pussy and I bet you get none

15

Anonymous #11 37w

As a matter of fact I do that’s how I ended up with my daughter

-13

Anonymous #11 37w

Oooh burn

1

Anonymous #13 37w

🤣

2

Anonymous #4 37w

Idk where you’re seeing that roast beef means “slut” but that’s like middle-schooler, pre-sex-ed incel shit. Sure, some ppl believe that “stretched out” myth bullshit, but the roast beef comment is usually just body shaming. Not cool regardless, but to equate it to a whole culture of misinformation is a bit obtuse, because I assure you that term existed long before the internet.

8

Anonymous #4 37w

Nah bro. Guys say it cuz some labias look like roast beef. It’s rly not that deep. Feel free to say my balls look like ice cream any day of the week!

8

Anonymous #2 37w

They didn’t say the balls are ice cream, they said theyre LIKE ice cream scoops… of elephant skin. Bring back reading comprehension please!

7

Anonymous #8 37w

Posting 2 memes bc your meme was not funny… jobs bro jobs.

3

Anonymous #4 37w

Circumcision is a violation of bodily autonomy and “roast beef” labia is equivalent to “anteater” foreskin that gets chopped off our infant bodies

4

Anonymous #18 37w

Well personally I love big labia so idk what this whole thing is about. But i believe male genital mutilation is worth being upset about

1

Anonymous #20 37w

foreskin and labia are most definitely not comparable 😭😭 those are completely different things, and it’s also different for each person and doesn’t effect anything or change. i’m also not disagreeing with the bodily autonomy part, it’s fucked up, but do not compare the two

0

Anonymous #18 37w

One is a metaphor, the other is a simile

1

Anonymous #12 37w

You’re proving their point

7

Anonymous #16 37w

Literally tho. It’s not deep at all. It’s a completely surface-level description

1

Anonymous #23 37w

Well they are biologically equivalent in the development of the genitalia. Plus, in female circumcision (practiced in America until the 1970s and banned outright in 1996) the inner labia is what is typically removed. So yeah- I’d say it’s comparable. If you have a reason against that, let us know.

3

Anonymous #19 37w

What does this mean 😭

0

Anonymous #19 37w

cause they don’t hve the same vaginas😭😭😭

1

Anonymous #23 37w

You’re right, if anything it’s less harmful to chop off a woman’s labia than a man’s foreskin

1

Anonymous #18 37w

Oh my God. Literally arguing semantics. Point is I don’t give a shit what you call it

1

Anonymous #16 37w

Any form of non consensual genital cutting is wrong and I’m not going to agree with one being worse or the other Ban circumcision

2

Anonymous #2 37w

If my coochie roast beef than eat it up

3

Anonymous #20 37w

I’m against them both but the comment left #23 made me think she was a woman who was pro male circumcision so I wanted to give her some perspective on what is happening to a persons genitals when you chop off a piece of it. Male circumcision being common in America makes ppl think that it’s is somehow totally fine and different than cutting off any other part of a persons body

1

Anonymous #16 37w

Left by #23

1

Anonymous #16 37w

Technically speaking male circumcision does remove ALOT more sensitive genital tissue (almost 50% of the mucosal erogenous tissue attached to the penis) like approximately an entire palm sized chunk of skin used in frictionless masturbation and improves sex for both parties

3

Anonymous #15 37w

*moans whoreishly from the corner*

4

Anonymous #11 37w

Their point ignores function, focusing only on form. It’s a bad point.

-1

Anonymous #12 37w

Balls are weak. They get hurt so easy. Instead of having balls, have a vagina.

6

Anonymous #27 37w

That’s just a slimy crevice. That’s why the vagina slang terms are so negative, save for where they’ve been reclaimed occasionally.

-5

Anonymous #2 30w

Ok

1

Anonymous #20 30w

Not in opposition to the idea of Pro-Choice, but along the same vein of reasoning. Srsly, I want that shit back

2

Anonymous #15 30w

I finished all my classes including medical school at Stanford

1

Anonymous #15 30w

That’s amazing that she’s bringing awareness to a controversial topic that most Americans don’t want to address: the widespread male genital mutilation that’s currently legal today.

3