Anonymous #1 3d

Ohh I see a small grammatical error 😅but I don’t think that invalidates the overall claim

32

Anonymous #4 3d

Tf does bean soup have to do with this

8

Anonymous #12 3d

someone posts about liking bean soup and all of the comments are “ew i hate bean soup”, the posts, in this case identifiers, just arent for them and therefor dont have to engage with it whatsoever

8

Anonymous #2 3d

If you’re talking about the person who just gave birth, that’s a birth giver. If they’re chest feeding…

-22

Anonymous #3 3d

Chest feeder is used in a medical context to refer to someone of unknown gender who is actively chest feeding.

-6

Anonymous #15 2d

this is not a hill worth dying on since the terms aren’t commonly used in a medical setting anyways, and they’re not used because many (understandably) find them objectifying, including trans people.

21

Anonymous #4 2d

But I’ve never had bean soup before

4

Anonymous #15 2d

But men can have breast too, actually it’s quite common and literally refers to organs on a human body? I don’t mean this in a anti-lgbtq+ way I’m just very curious because my neurodivergent brain is not understanding the logic behind this

1

Anonymous #16 2d

No you’re completely right. Breast is the correct medical term. Which both men and women have. It’s actually quite weird people want to remove the term breast like they’re erasing men having breasts from reality. Wait until “chestfeeder” advocates find out about male breast cancer

9

Anonymous OP 2d

Dw people try to find any way to invalidate a good argument even if it’s one tiny error that has no bearing on the argument itself

9

Anonymous #17 2d

"always blame the leftists"... yeah that's a cognitively sound way to form opinions

9

Anonymous #17 2d

On top of what #14 you are conflating leftists (some of which hold the values you stated) with Liberals who subscribe to liberal philosophy (most of which hold the values you stated). I would agree that many liberals (particularly white cis college educated ones) harp about identity politics to a degree that seemingly alienates the diversity they claim to want to make space for and creates an electorally focused mindset that does not have room for the messy nuance of changing local politics.

6

Anonymous #14 2d

You also are being incredibly vague in the context of the #OP’s post when all you say Liberals (not Leftists let’s not mince words) are ‘pursing being as progressive as possible’ because you are assuming a reader understands that you are speaking only in the context of identity politics (?) and furthermore not showing why being overly progressive actually dehumanizes anyone cus the whole point of more progressive identity politics is to combat that and 2 of 3 terms above are doing the opposite.

8

Anonymous #19 2d

Srry for grammar I’m a yapper and I hate character limits

6

Anonymous #18 2d

it was a joke oml 😭

5

Anonymous #19 2d

yeah the chestfeeders thing isnt a leftist thing it’s a performative liberal thing

8

Anonymous #20 2d

Omg really it’s not like I didn’t already address the grammatical error earlier 🤗

1

Anonymous OP 2d

It’s not even a grammatical error but my fault for not reading through every single comment ig

1

Anonymous #20 2d

Technically it’s a spelling error

4

Anonymous #12 2d

Bot

-2

Anonymous #19 2d

Say it again and see what happens

5

Hey dipshit, a bot would get it right every time. The inconsistencies should prove they’re human if anything 🤦🤦🤦

1

Anonymous #20 2d

Ik they are human I called them a bot as in insult cus they are saying some stupid shit but ik thinking is hard so it’s all good

-2

Anonymous #19 2d

All I said was it was a spelling error which is factually and objectively correct. Some other dude said all the other shi ur talking about. Low iq ahhhh

3

Anonymous #19 2d

Some of us are autistic and interpret things as they’re actually written 🙌

1

Anonymous #17 2d

To clarify, as #19 stated. There is a fundamental difference between being a liberal and a leftist. I’ve always blamed the leftists for being the sole group who plagued us with Trump because it’s like newtons 3rd law of motion. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Under Obamas second term the leftists were at their strongest and were so absolutely confident they would get their democratic socialist future they so desperately wanted. But in their ignorance, they nominated

6

Anonymous #17 2d

hillary instead of Bernie Sanders. And that’s when it all fell apart for them.

4

Anonymous #17 2d

I was JUST talking about this in another thread, that’s when the DNC shattered all illusions for me. Bernie literally had 2/3 of the votes at one point too, about double the other candidates combined

1

Anonymous #21 2d

Being trans isn’t a choice either, dipshit

1

Anonymous #16 1d

Who cares if you mean in it an anti-lgbtq+ way? Stop tap dancing to make yourself feel good. Women 99.9% have breasts and men don’t. Men just have useless nipples. Sheesh.

-1

Anonymous #20 1d

Then you have to admit the Dems practice in election rigging. They did it against Trump in 2020 and I fucking barge Trump. But that’s why we have him in office now as the second president in U.S. history to serve non-consecutive terms.

2

Anonymous #17 1d

Woman and man are purely subjective terms and are a sociological human construct. The terms you’re looking for are “assigned male at birth” and “assigned female at birth”

0

Anonymous #17 1d

I’m not saying they’re the ones rigging things but they sure as shit aren’t doing anything tangible to stop the other side from doing it, which makes them complicit at best

2

Anonymous #20 1d

they didn’t say it wasn’t, I think you’re misreading

1

Anonymous #20 1d

Yeah ur def misreading lol I’m just saying people are going to be called cis whether they like it or not and they really need to get over it.

1

Anonymous #17 1d

this is some conspiracy theorist shit 😭 Hillary is barely liberal, if that. why would leftists want her lmao

1

Anonymous #17 1d

did you read the comment abt how men get breast cancer or are we just saying shit

3