Anonymous #4 20h

Republican women literally cater to men they are the easiest women alive who votes against their own rights without an ulterior motive LMAO

10

Anonymous #5 7h

Or maybe, just maybe, they aren’t voting against their rights… Like maybe they already have rights. And being easy is a bit much considering the general culture around the two groups 😂

1

Anonymous #8 6h

They are voting to go against their own rights, they gave up their reproductive rights even after rape or fatal fetal diagnoses abortion is not an option for them, school protections against sexual harassment were taken down with protection against discrimination against sexual orientation or gender identity, public health and maternal research was cut, etc. you would do your own research if you cared but you don’t. They cater to incels like you who know nothing, just for some attention.

1

Anonymous #5 6h

Yeah, except people with “gender identity” issues are what we’re talking about, and the ones who vote pro life have… *drum roll please* Morals.

-1

Anonymous #8 6h

Morals yet if a little girl were to be raped pro-lifers would force her to have the baby but the ones with “gender identity issues” wouldn’t

4

Anonymous #5 6h

*Typo on my previous reply, I meant “aren’t what we’re talking about” Now that I’ve fixed that. Yeah?… Tell me this, what does killing the baby accomplish? The mother has already been through terrible trauma, you wanna add a death on top of that? Go after the rapist, punish them, both the baby. And no, we’re not all rapist and pedophiles😑 (I have a feeling that’s were you were gonna go)

-1

Anonymous #8 6h

1)The fact that you assumed I was going to call all of you pedos and rapists says numbers already, but the best part of your long ass message is that you completely ignored what my message said, if you cared to read it I brought up laws against women that they voted for, including discrimination against gender identity such as being identified as a women, I also brought up reproductive rights being voted against which i included that abortion is voted against EVEN when there is a FATAL diagnosis

1

Anonymous #5 6h

2) With the fetus, so please tell me why a baby should be brought into this world to suffer, and why would someone be forced to have a baby they don’t want for so many reasons such as expenses, health issues, and not to mention having to birth the baby of your rapist..? Looking at that baby only for it to remind you of what happened.

3

Anonymous #5 6h

The comment isn’t actually that long, but the screen is just so narrow. Still, the comment I replied to was 100% about a scenario where a girl is raped. I clearly addressed that we were not talking about people who “identify” as a woman (implying that is not their physical sex), when I cleared up my typo. And the assumption of your name calling says more about people like you… that you repeat the same lies over and over. Throwing around what should be known as some of the worst crimes… cont

0

Anonymous #8 6h

as insults until they lose all meaning, and nobody can take them serious.

0

Anonymous #8 5h

1) where was my name calling? 2) you say we aren’t talking about gender identity but the only reason i brought it up was because you say they aren’t voting against their own rights and that was one of my arguments 3) I’m repeating myself because you clearly aren’t understanding a single thing I’m saying 4) yes that was they scenario and I already addressed that

1

Anonymous #5 5h

Answered before the second half came through. Simple, the baby is a life, WE value human life. We don’t “put people down” like we do with animals we don’t need, or are in pain. A mother can heal from trauma, a baby cannot rise from the dead. It’s a terrible situation, but preserving life is still a priority.

-1

Anonymous #5 5h

(1) notice I said the assumption. You didn’t, but you claimed the fact that I assumed you would do so says something about me. I’m turn I explained what it really shows. (2) duh, gender identity isn’t woman issue… which makes it irrelevant to the original statements. (3) No, you just said you’re repeating yourself with out actually doing it 🤪. (4)Yes, my bad. I received a notification before the second half of your reply came through. (As I bet you are doing for me right now…😑)

0

Anonymous #8 5h

1) Abortions are typically done within the first 3 weeks meaning the a fetus has not yet formed, it has no heartbeat, no brain, nothing for it to be identified, it’s a clump of cells, we aren’t losing a human life. A woman can heal but not forget and that “baby” would be a reminder everyday of what that poor girl was put through. But I could care less to argue with someone where their “morals” are with a clump of cells rather than and actual human and someone who says they value a clump of cells

1

Anonymous #5 5h

2) over a living animal or human

1

Anonymous #5 5h

Over an animal yes, not over a human. That’d be valuing human over human, which is a personal choice with no right answer. The point that life technically begins has probably been debated for as long as abortion has been an issue. We’re both wasting time trying to prove something that the _experts_ themselves argue over.

0

Anonymous #8 5h

It literally is a clump of cells and science has proven that life doesn’t form until about 5 weeks in that’s why the terms cell and embryo are used and not fetus. So no you’re not valuing human over human, you’re valuing cells over human. But you’re right trying to prove something like this to someone with their head in their ass like you would get us no where. Oh and fyi I’m aborting the cells in me!

1

Anonymous #5 5h

Well that’s sad… But you complete missed he point of not valuing human over human… I don’t value human over human, which is why when there is an option for both to live I will pick that option.

1

Anonymous #8 5h

Oh and P.S. No science hasn’t proven that 🤦‍♂️. Hence it’s still debated by people who’d like to kill that “clump”

1

Anonymous #8 1h

babies arent ppl ngl

1