
#2 gave a really good answer but i just want to add that in addition to Israel never using that to justify its actions, most Jews don’t care about Israel the state because of that, either. we have separate but intertwined relationship with Israel the state (Medinat Israel) and Israel/Palestine the actual physical land (Eretz Yisrael). the land we have a religious/ethnic connection to. the state we have a political connection to— 1 out of every 2 Jews lives there and we care about them
I can’t see what 2 said but I would say any anti-zionist Jew who knows you are also anti Zionist and you make it clear that you are anti Zionist before you make the joke(so that they know it is not from a place of antisemitism) would probably make similar jokes with you. Me and many of my friends make these jokes all the time tbh
To put it in perspective: I'm a hardcore atheist and think all Abrahamic religions are a cancer on humanity. I just don't go around saying that, because it's rude and unproductive. I will, however, freely mock Israel. I've payed them enough in taxes to earn that right. Would anti-Israel Jewish people be offended by me saying this particular thing? I find it appealing as an insult because it calls attention to the absurdity of religious states.
This is a fair answer, thank you. I stand by all I have said about hating religious states and religious dogma as a whole, but if Jewish people find the idea of a better form of Israel existing one day comforting I suppose me mocking that won't help my case. I will never support Israel in practice, or any religious state, but the belief itself is harmless.
Cultural conservatism and religious dogma are inherently detrimental to our species. Judaism in particular falls into the trap of all Abrahamic religions: wanting to kill each other forever over a random spot in the middle of nowhere that serves zero value to anyone. So many wasted lives in the name of texts written by shamanistic savages. I don't go around saying this every day, I don't hate people who practice. People are usually good. But you asked, so I feel the need to be bluntly honest.
I think it's a waste of time. The damage to their cultures isn't getting undone, no matter what happens. It's just to make Americans feel less guilty for their founder's actions. I admit, I can't muster much hatred. These religions are all but stamped out, not governing our society's future the way Abrahamic ideology does.
Even if I agreed that it isn't right now, I think founding a state because you expect it to become a religious state is just extra steps. But let's agree to disagree. I won't say the 3000 years thing anymore, for the reasons you laid out. I respect you for answering my question as I intended it.
I hate the consequences more than the culture. I wouldn't say I necessarily hate Jews or Christians or Muslims, more the consequences of these religions and their various beliefs and feuds on the world at large. I do recognize that Judaism has perpetrated far fewer horrors than Christianity or Islam, and harbor deep cultural trauma from centuries of oppression. I don't relish that. If anything, it enforces my belief that religion ultimately brings more harm than good at such a scale.
you do understand that even with the horrors that our ancestors have experienced, we are still proud of our deep and rich history, the fact that we have held onto our practices for thousands of years whilst living in diaspora? we have endured persecution for generations upon generations and our ancestors still held onto who they were with such pride and strength. many of us wouldn’t trade our identity for anything in the world, even with all that our ancestors have gone through and what we are
also just want to explain a little more about the hebrew terms i used there: they’re different ways we define parts of collective identity. in ancient times, our ancestors considered themselves and their homeland to be like one being, Yisrael. when we were expelled from Yisrael and went into Diaspora (the Hebrew word, galut, has a much more tragic connotation than the English), Yisrael was split into Am Yisrael (the peoplehood/nation/ethnic group) and Eretz Yisrael (the land)
for 2,000 years in galut religious Jews dreamed of a reunification between Eretz Yisrael and Am Yisrael, but believed that the wound was so deep it couldn’t be healed until the coming of the Messiah. then (to very much oversimplify an extremely complicated piece of history), the Zionist movement established Medinat Israel, a modern secular nation-state with a Jewish identity, on part of Eretz Yisrael.
the 20th century happened (massive oversimplification), and by the end 50% of Am Yisrael was living in Medinat Israel. BUT the people of Medinat Israel are not all part of Am Yisrael, so there’s kind of an extended family thing going on between non-Jewish Israelis, Jewish Israelis, and Diaspora Jews. so now Medinat, Am, and Eretz Yisrael are like a very confusing 3-way Venn diagram. and that’s without even getting to Israelis and Palestinians
my grandmother, although not a holocaust survivor, had to flee her respective country or be killed for who she was. she fled and held onto her judaism until the very end. she was a badass woman, and may her memory forever be a blessing. i wouldn’t dare disgrace all she sacrificed so that her children, grandchildren, and great grand children could carry her torch.
I see the current bloodshed caused by the creation of modern Israel as a direct result of Jewish religious beliefs. Nothing you can say will make me see that as anything but a waste and a net negative for our species. Even if I believed it was all purely self defense, it's killing caused by following the orders of bedtime stories. More people dead for magic dirt.
Putting on a skirt and moving to a warzone aren't comparable. 6 brings up a good point about refugees, I will admit. But no rational person should move to that region unless they have literally no other choice. My point is more that if Israel hadn't been hastily formed in this volatile area, a lot of innocent people would still be alive. Its creation, in this way in this time, was a fundamentally unwise decision motivated by religion.
Israel wasn’t formed for religious reasons though. Zionism was a secular movement driven by fear about antisemitism. its true that if Israel had never been formed, a lot of innocent people would still be alive. but also a lot of innocent people who are alive now would be dead or never born because their ancestors had nowhere to run to
Jews have lived in the land unbroken for thousands of years. They where there when it was colonized by the ottomans, they where there when it was controlled by the byzantines. You do make a point With Canada. The Israelis didn’t completely wipe tribes off the face of the map like Canadians and force other natives into education camps in a form of ethnic erasure.
It's not your land. It's not anybody's land. No land "belongs" to anyone in any meaningful way. The concept is a collective human psychosis and vestigial evolutionary trait. Safety of the Jewish people is not the priority of Israel. The fulfillment of delusional prophecy is. You openly admit to being willing to throw your life away to die on this pile of dirt over seeking safety elsewhere. Another century of purposeless war and lives of fear is all that awaits its people.
Perhaps I should. This thread isn't helping me or anyone else. I shouldn't have gone into my own anti-religious beliefs and just accepted the answer I was looking for. I'm too attracted to argument for my own good sometimes. I did learn some interesting things, so hopefully it wasn't a total loss.