Anonymous #1 1d

It’s a tzaf, so it is beis

3

Anonymous OP 1d

you say that because you’re a dirty ashki who doesn’t believe in the holy language as it was intended. go learn real hebrew, grifter

0

Anonymous #1 1d

(i really hope everyone who reads this knows that i know who OP is and we are in fact friends)

4

Comment Deleted

0

dump? learn how to speak english first and then talk to me.

0

Anonymous #1 1d

You only say that because Eliezer Ben Yehudah had to dumb down the language for you.

5

Anonymous OP 1d

saw your original comment, can’t backtrack now.

1

Anonymous #1 1d

Post a screenshot or you’re a dirty liar like the rest of your kind, slipper girl

0

Anonymous OP 1d

now why the fuck would i take a screenshot of you being illiterate? but from now on, i will be doing that so i can make an album on my phone of blackmail material.

1

Anonymous #1 1d

Mom, Dad, stop fighting.

4

Anonymous #2 1d

😭😭😭😭

1

Anonymous #3 1d

Can, but they don’t.

5

Anonymous OP 1d

And you assume this bc

0

Anonymous OP 1d

You realize we’re living in 2026 right? Organized Religion is a dying movement and has been for decades especially among US Jews. If anything you’re in the minority among people who would be demographically categorized as Jews

6

Anonymous #4 1d

They will call good bad and bad good. Moshiach is coming, return to G-d

5

Anonymous OP 1d

Well if you think right-wing tribalistic beliefs are “good” you’re a moron and a zealot.

4

Anonymous #4 1d

It’s not really tribalistic if everyone is inherently accepted (goy and Jew alike) fundamentally in Judaism. Moshiach is not exclusive to devout Jews. Better to be a driver than a bystander in building a better world.

4

Anonymous #5 1d

Using the term goy unironically is tribalistic in of itself

0

Anonymous #4 1d

Most languages and cultures have a term for the out-group. It’s not tribalistic, it’s a modifier. That’s like saying calling someone a ‘woman’ vs. a ‘man’ is tribalistic. There are inherent differences in belief systems, language, and cultures of Jews vs. goys.

6

Anonymous #5 1d

It’s actually more like saying infidels and believers

-2

Anonymous #4 1d

No, because infidel has an inherently derogatory connotation. Also believers and infidels are choices according to XYZ religion. You can’t choose to be a Jew or a hot.

8

Anonymous #4 1d

*Jew or a toy

12

Anonymous #5 1d

**JEW OR A GOY

9

Anonymous #5 1d

We’re not shtetl Jews none of us are systematically excluded from participation in society. It’s so stupid to continue using terms like goy in modern America where the average Jewish lifestyle is hardly different and likely easier than many of your (black and brown) neighbors

-2

Anonymous #4 1d

Goy is a word from the Torah. It’s a Hebrew word. If you don’t like it then take it up with the creators of the language.

12

Anonymous #4 1d

Maybe YOU are non-practicing, but many of us are. We didn’t abandon the righteous lifestyle. If you did, good. This is your choice, but idk why you’re trying to be a representative for all Jews.

11

Anonymous #5 1d

If you think the deploying the term goy unironically doesn’t have a negative connotation associated with it, I’m afraid you’re not living on the same planet as me. Where do you think the popularity of the word “goyslop” among normies came from?

-1

Anonymous #4 1d

It has negative connotations on the mainstream internet because Nazis think it’s derogatory, not because it is derogatory

6

Anonymous #4 1d

We’re not living in the same COMMUNITY as you. We’re definitely on the same planet. Idk why you, as a Jew, are validating Neo-Nazi terminology but go off? Also isn’t the word “normie” tribalistic?

9

Anonymous OP 1d

No because Jews (especially Israelis, and elites like Epstein) do unironically deploy “goy” as derogatory. I see people do it on here when they get mad that someone posts anti-Zionist stuff. The point is It reinforces an in-group out-group dynamic.

-6

Anonymous #4 1d

So now you’re generalizing Jews. Fantastic. Are you even Jewish? Do you know the meaning of the word ‘goy?’

8

Anonymous #5 1d

I meant normie as in someone who would otherwise live an apolitical existence. I should’ve clarified

-2

Anonymous #4 1d

It IS an in-group out-group dynamic.

6

Anonymous #5 1d

It’s far more righteous to do other things than go pray in a synagogue every week.

-2

Anonymous #5 1d

It’s giving “my dads father is Jewish, so engaging in Nazi talking points is fine”

8

Anonymous #4 1d

You don’t know what righteousness is; righteousness is predicated onon yiras shamayim and kabbolas ol, anything else is selfishness at its core

3

Anonymous #4 1d

Yeah I agree. Like living a Jewish life. That’s righteous. Understanding the meaning of community. But yeah man, go ahead and rank and diminish other people’s mitzvot, that’s very righteous.

10

Anonymous #6 1d

Yeah and I’m saying that’s bad.

-2

Anonymous OP 1d

No righteousness is defending the weak/oppressed and acting as the voice of the voiceless. It’s not that complicated

-2

Anonymous #4 1d

You’re a hypocrite. Against in-group, out-group dynamics (a fundamental in most spoken languages globally), but fine calling people “normies.” What a disappointment this conversation is.

8

Anonymous #4 1d

Maybe in your definition, but I prefer the God given one.

10

Anonymous #5 1d

Normies aren’t defined by inherited traits dumbass, that’s the difference

-2

Anonymous #5 1d

Glad we agree

-1

Anonymous #4 1d

Neither are believers and infidels. They also aren’t defined by inherited traits as per your previous argument. So now what? Is it also okay to use ‘believer’ and ‘infidel?’

5

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #5 1d

Well personally I prefer to think for myself

0

Anonymous #4 1d

Wallah you don’t understand sarcasm. This may be a bigger shonda than berating our religion - you don’t get our HUMOR either! 😭

1

Anonymous #4 1d

The world is sustained by three pillars: Torah, divine service, and acts of loving-kindness. You lack all three

1

I’d argue the world is sustained through labor.

-2

Anonymous #4 1d

And so what can someone as uninformed as you tell us about hard work?

6

Anonymous #1 1d

also, when we do refer to non-jews as a whole and not a particular organized religion, we do say goyim and more often than not, it’s not used in a derogatory way. of course, bad apples will run with something neutral and make it derogatory, jewish or not, but to generalize an entire demographic because you’re against where they’re from and demonize them speaks volumes about yourself. you want to normalize acceptance of all yet ostracize a group that you dislike based on geography and your

1

Anonymous #5 1d

Lol.

-2

Anonymous #1 1d

personal morals. if someone could do me a favour and screenshot this then comment it in response to their comments, i would greatly appreciate that because i am not going to unblock everyone i have blocked but do feel like they may need to read what i have to say.

1

Anonymous #4 1d

Your moral framework is flawed and ultimately the work of human selfishness. Remember all the commandments of the Lord and do them, and not follow the desires of your own heart and your own eyes.

6

Anonymous #5 1d

So are you arguing that goy is an even more exclusionary term than infidel?

-1

Anonymous #4 1d

“The world is sustained through labor, but I would never never never never never actually get a job”

3

Anonymous #6 1d

Am I supposed to show you my pay stubs now?

-2

Anonymous #4 1d

No. I’m pointing out the holes in your logic. You just said ‘normie’ is fine to use since it’s not based on inherited traits. Neither is ‘infidel’ such as in Christian or Muslim beliefs as anyone can convert and become a ‘believer.’ So if ‘normie’ is fine then ‘believer’ and ‘infidel’ should be too under the same logic. Either that, or you’re a hypocrite and aren’t consistent.

6

Anonymous #4 1d

Will your pay stubs be imprinted on the divine design of Earth and life after your death?

10

Anonymous #4 1d

We are a nation of priests, holy unto the Lord, our God, his chosen firstborn among all nations. Yeah there’s gonna be an in-group and an out-group.

5

Anonymous #5 1d

Yeah so infidel is arguably less derogatory

-1

Anonymous #6 1d

Do you speak like this when you’re out in public.

-1

Anonymous #4 1d

Proselytizing is against the Jewish faith as you may be unaware, so it would be odd to speak like this out in public. Why bother asking him such a nonsense question?

8

Anonymous #4 1d

Only when dealing with Nazis and Commies; not exactly sure which category you fall under

3

Anonymous #5 1d

Cause it’s funny

0

Anonymous #6 1d

Not the genocidal denial

0

Anonymous #6 1d

Commie. Judeo-Bolshevik style

-1

Anonymous #6 1d

Have you read this book it might help. It’s written by a shitlib but it’s decent work

-1

Anonymous #4 1d

Judeo-Bolsheviks were not an actual historical group outside of nazi propaganda. You know that, right?

5

Anonymous #4 1d

Judaism and Bolshevism are fundamentally incompatible

4

Anonymous #6 1d

There’s a reason the term was popular. A lot of Jews were communists. Prior to WW2

-1

Anonymous #4 1d

You’re not gonna guess who popularized the term

6

Anonymous #6 1d

Ok. Then call me a Bolshevik.

-1

Anonymous #4 1d

Because 6 is absolutely right, it’s a Nazi conspiracy theory

5

Anonymous #4 1d

I never thought you were anything Jewish in the first place

8

Anonymous OP 1d

Lots of people antisemitism was a populist and institutional sentiment back then.

-1

Anonymous #4 1d

So you understand that it’s a antisemitic conspiracy theory. So I don’t know why you thought that identity was a valid one to identify with.

6

Anonymous #6 1d

Well I did get bar-mitzvahed. And went to volunteer at my synagogue every week after. So idk you decide whether I’m Jewish or not, apparently you know better.

1

Anonymous #4 1d

What parasha did you do?

6

Anonymous #6 1d

Yes I understand it’s an antisemitic conspiracy theory meant to discredit communist movements as a Jewish plot to take power.

0

Anonymous #4 1d

It was privately meant to blame the Jews for communism, which was the primary motivator

5

Anonymous OP 1d

The covenant of the rainbow and the the story of Izaiah in the haftorah

1

Anonymous OP 1d

Well the motivating factor for the bourgeois class was to use antisemitism to galvanize reactionary lumpenproles against the proletarian movement. That way their class position and power wouldn’t be threatened.

1

Anonymous #4 1d

So you don’t even mention the name of your parasha. Crazy

6

Anonymous OP 1d

The new scapegoat term is islamo-communism/(islamogoschism in France) cause commies are organizing Muslim communities at the pro-Palestine protests and vice versa.

1

Anonymous OP 1d

By parasha You mean the section of the Torah I was supposed to read? I don’t remember it was a long time ago. Also most synagogues have different Saturday morning service practices in the US so… idk.

1

Anonymous OP 1d

After googling it I guess, you would know it by the name parashah noach

1