Anonymous #2 63w

you have to choose the lesser evil.

8

Anonymous #2 63w

read what i'm saying again. babe the election is in the rearview... and yet here we are still stanning a genocider who lost to another genocider...

1

Anonymous #2 63w

also "was not perfect" is a pretty nice way of saying war criminal who wanted to fund the slaughter of innocent civilians...

1

Anonymous #3 63w

i hate the current president. i fucking shit on him every time possible. i will not stand for people supporting genocidal maniacs regardless

2

Anonymous #3 63w

you don't see many folks in this community stanning him though...

3

Comment Deleted

0

literally. but we gotta make everything about orange man who we all already hate...

1

Comment Deleted

0

not really the public's fault either tbh. the dnc would have ran a pro israel pro status quo candidate regardless.

1

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

i don't necessarily agree just considering the US's historic ties to israel. i think they did it anyway knowing it was unpopular and it cost them the leftists vote.

0

i mean true, but the candidates who progress are ultimately the most well funded. the system is literally designed to prevent more progressive candidates from moving up because they're stances are less popular with corporations

0

Anonymous ellie 63w

their*

0

Comment Deleted

0

no yeah i agree. but i do think a ton of anti trumpers lines were drawn at genocide—at least from what i've seen (which is a pretty progressive crowd). i may be off the mark here however as i'm not working with a huge sample size

1

i was under the impression that that's what cost her the progressive vote and election

1

once again i may be off the mark

1

Comment Deleted

0

once again i think that comes down to primarily how the system works rather than the public. i think where my perspective differs is that i view this as another case of institutions protecting capitalism. she was the candidate given the most screen time, the most funding for her campaign, etc. people who aren't necessarily knowledgeable about the system and are purposely mislead by the government fell into a pitfall. i don't necessarily think it was the publics fault for that—if that makes sense

3

Anonymous bowlinggreen_tornado 63w

not really. this is just basic intersectionality

0

Anonymous ellie 63w

It’s ultimatums and it’s cringe.

5

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous bowlinggreen_tornado 63w

yeah we shouldn't support those perpetuating genocide hard stop. if u disagree u might need to do some soul searching

1

exactly! i view the people in charge as to blame because they're the ones peddling this while others look to them as examples. when they cut things like education or push propaganda in schools people aren't taught to view things from a different angle so they never will.

1

Anonymous ellie 63w

also putting words in peoples mouth. Cringe. Never said i disagreed. Genocide is bad. Dem or republican we’ve been blowing up brown people for a decade.

4

Anonymous bowlinggreen_tornado 63w

more than a decade

1

Anonymous bowlinggreen_tornado 63w

but yeah. i believe if u don't stand for queer rights everywhere then u don't stand for queer rights. it's a global issue. i said what i said

1

Anonymous ellie 63w

Do the semantics matter? Any amount of time was never ok bro. Most people are against the genocide. I wish I could say all but people are weird like that. But to say if you support a certain candidate you’re fake is wild.

2

Comment Deleted

0

okay yeah i see ur point

1

Anonymous bowlinggreen_tornado 63w

yeah if u still stan a genocider like kamala long after the election is over and done with—knowing her stance on palestine and the genocide, then ur fake.

1

Anonymous bowlinggreen_tornado 63w

u can still think she's the better candidate out of the two. you can still think america would've been better under her... but if ur out here looking past her genocide support to shout from the rooftops about how great she would've been then i have an issue with u.

3