Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
trans men getting offended by ‘man-hating’ or ‘misandry’ because it ‘makes them not feel good about being men’ is indirectly the most affirming thing because wow only a man would spout that BS
upvote 81 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 17w

and in case anyone has something to say: misandry doesn’t exist, it’s only women reacting to misogyny. We hate what men DO and what they SAY, it’s not inherently because they are men. If you are a man, trans or otherwise, and you are secure in the fact that you are NOT misogynistic, then obviously the hate isn’t for YOU. You should be able to listen to women’s experiences without feeling like it’s a personal attack.

upvote 37 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 17w

As a trans man, it’s always either them telling on themselves (bc trans men can still be misogynistic) or it’s bc they’re younger and don’t understand the difference and think “i hate men” posts are about ALL men and not just the ones who are misogynistic/generally bad people

upvote 21 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 17w

Yea. How do you feel about the term "transandrophobia"?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17w

do you think my post is somehow transandophobic?

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 17w

I think you’re exactly right. That’s why I usually try to explain it, even when whatever they said made me mad, because there’s a chance it’s actually just a misunderstanding. Although, I’ve found quite a lot of men get mad at ME for explaining it and complain about women not being more clear or whatever instead of just owning up to their mistake, but that’s beside the point

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17w

🚩. the term with the least baggage i’ve seen used by serious/well-meaning queer theorists is anti-transmasculinity.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 17w

I was curious since that word also gets floated around

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 17w

I know very little about internet discourse but see a range of words that seem kinda similar to me, so ty for the info!

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17w

oh okay 😭 it seemed like you were accusing me of something lol I had never heard the word before you mentioned it, I had to look it up

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 17w

Nah, I just thought that they might be somehow related/overlapping topics. Misandry is def not real (weirdly, sometimes I talk to people irl who say that misandry does exist systemically and that they agree with it? And I’m like uhmmmmm okay bestie & just kinda move on) & I've also seen discourse about the idea of transphobia specific to masculine identities

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 17w

No I fully get you. I’ve had also men (cis and trans) get mad at me for trying to explain that if they’re not doing *the bad things* then they’re not the ones being talked about. It’s tiering- especially when they act like understanding where women are coming from equals being a “pick me”

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 17w

i’m not even going to dignify that with a proper reply 🤦‍♀️

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 17w

You just did

upvote -7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 17w

what do think ‘proper’ means in this context? I know you’re not very smart but I thought you’d at least be able to read.

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17w

there are forms of transphobia that are specific toward transmasculinity. this is basic intersectional theory. oppression and marginalization do not function as merely additive (ex. black women do not experience racism + misogyny, they experience misogynoir—the misogyny they experience cannot be separated from the racism, in fact the *kind* of misogyny they experience is grounded in racism, and vice versa, the racism they experience cannot be separated from the misogyny which targets them.)

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17w

so yes, anti-trans masculinity is a real phenomenon that needs and deserves specific study and attention. there is just some tension because the history of many of it’s central figures (especially within online discourse) is deeply transmisogynistic. transmisandry and transandrophobia were both coined by transmisogynists, so i view their usage as a red flag (tho ik many may be unaware of this), which is why i suggested using the term anti-transmasculinity instead.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17w

anti-transmasculinity also speaks directly to what is being targeted, instead of reifying problematic concepts (misandry) or trying to coin a direct corollary to transmisogyny (transandrophobia) (faulty premise). this tension is not exclusive to queer theory, ex there is tension between black male studies and black feminism. yes, the experiences of marginalized men are specific and need to be examined, but *some* reinforce misogynistic dynamics in their study and get called out.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 17w

Thank you for more information! One quick thing - I thought transmisogyny was coined by Julia Serrano? Am I missing some info about her?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17w

yes she did. not sure where the confusion is coming in?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 17w

I didn’t know she was transmisogynist, unless I'm not reading what you said correctly? (I haven't read Whipping Girl, but I've read a couple of her free essays, and they seemed mostly fine. I was a little concerned about one or two parts, but when I brought them to others, they said they were fine)

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17w

she isn’t? i didn’t say or imply she was. i’m not sure where the confusion is coming from.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17w

the people who coined transmisandry and transandrophobia were transmisogynists. julia serrano, the theorist who coined transmisogyny, is not a transmisogynist. anti-transmasculinity was not coined by transmisogynists and is used frequently by transfeminists + queer theorists.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 17w

OH I'm so sorry I completely read "transmisandry" as "transmisogyny" 😭 I learned a new word today too that’s completely my bad

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17w

no worries lol! just had to pinpoint where the communication breakdown was and i figured that’s what had happened.

upvote 4 downvote