
that misogyny isn't "male privelage" if it doesn't benefit them. that's just misogyny. again, any examples of scenarios in which it benefits them in ways not disregarded by the fact they're a minority? because all you're saying rn is "minority men can still be misogynistic" which. yes. they can be. but misogyny isn't inherently male privelage unless they are benefitting from the systemic ways misogyny is enforced.