Anonymous #1 4w

trump is far more pro genocide than kamala

10

Anonymous #2 4w

that’s actually not true when it comes to palestine, she is a huge supporter of israel and always has been

-3

Anonymous #1 4w

Not just a clown but the whole circus. Non voters are the literal reason we’re in this position. Someone stupid enough to think both options were equally as bad and therefore didn’t need to vote are criminally stupid

8

Anonymous #1 4w

yall r downvoting, prove me wrong! show me where kamala says she supports a free palestine. please.

-1

Anonymous #3 4w

i voted for kamala but yall need to realize blaming your peers instead of the politicians that aren’t doing enough is what they want you to do.

-1

Anonymous #1 4w

kamala has advocated for a two state solution while trump is actively pro genocide and fully annexing gaza. sometimes you have to choose the lesser evil in order to preserve some lives, even if you can’t save them all.

6

Anonymous #2 4w

she has continuously expressed her “unwavering commitment to israel” and has stated she will “always ensure israel has the ability to defend itself”. she stated herself that if she was elected president she would continue to arm israel. a genocide is a genocide no matter how much you cover it with claims of supporting compromise

-1

Anonymous #2 4w

again bro i voted for her but she is still supportive of the genocide in palestine you factually cannot deny that

-1

Anonymous #1 4w

i’m just saying she wouldn’t cause as much harm as trump that’s all. my argument is that kamala winning would be better (not good but better) than trump given that trump is even more antagonistic towards gaza, so the people (esp in swing states) that didn’t vote as an act of protest actually did more harm than good

5