Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
gender-affirming care does not mean surgery. no child is undergoing cosmetic surgery for being trans. worry about pageant moms giving their daughters nose jobs if u actually gaf about kids. oh wait - they don’t care about kids, only hate trans ones.
upvote 604 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

Does getting circumcised count as gender affirming care? Because they’re all for that🙄

upvote 92 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

republican bitches will cry about the awful chemicals in vaccines and medicine then turn around and slather 40v bleach all over their 6y/os head every 3 weeks

upvote 22 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

not to mention when they are completely okay with doing countless surgeries on their young intersex children just to make them appear more cisgender sometimes at the cost of taking out genital nerves so sex is no longer pleasurable 😒

upvote 20 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

Preaching to the choir

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

They also forget the fact that PBs are completely safe and reversible and hormones can be stopped and largely undone early on in their use as well, and that there are techniques to undo the changes (voice training, electrolysis, weight cycling, etc). But noooo, hate on a minority and make sure *nobody* gets the care they need instead. 🙄

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

Some trans kids get top surgery as minors (16+ usually), and they should be allowed to do that. Like I'm 100% on board with your point but you're also kind of saying that you also think those kids shouldn't be able to get top surgery when that’s basically the only surgery that's considered medically for trans youth

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 8w

are u serious …😭😭😭

upvote -13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 8w

Can I get the mic a little higher?

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 8w

this is actually a good point and i’ve heard some good debates on this. honestly im not sure where I stand because i’ve been told it’s normal and necessary and only now am learning about the downsides and unnecessary nature of it. definitely a topic worth speaking about more!

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 8w

I didn’t ask for my dick to get chopped bro😭

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

Tbh there aren’t many downsides other than it’s an unnecessary risk. Doctors, no matter how much practice, can still botch a surgery and your kid might leave with half of what they came with. Or they might not even realize until the dude gets older and he’ll need surgery again, but as an adult. People also say it’s cleaner when cut, but that’s just if you’re lazy and don’t clean your dick. If you shower like a normal person, you’re fine. You also get to keep more nerve endings which feels nice

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #10 8w

the brainrot reaches all aspects of life

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #12 8w

bro is complaining about brainrot on yikyak. you lost?

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

Circumcision was never medically necessary and the West didn’t do so at all unless you were Jewish until it became a thing in North America, specifically the USA. There was actually a ban on it in the 15th century imposed by the Council of Florence, banning the practice across Christendom, and this persisted until the 19th century. This isn’t, and never was, about hygiene, it’s about the delusional belief that it has any benefit and literally soap and water are enough to clean it.

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 8w

There are way more downsides than you’d think, the risk for infection being one of them, but it also paradoxically increases your risk of STDs and penile cancer overall. We don’t know why. Also, the female equivalent, even done under anesthesia, is considered to be borderline sexual assault, and is banned by basically every country on earth.

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 8w

Just a general reply to this comment section: I watched the documentary “American Circumcision” and it was really informative! I recommend it to anyone wanting to learn about the subject

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #16 8w

and that pb were originally made for cisgender children going through puberty at a very early age

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #14 8w

But that doesn’t let them pretend Trans kids are being harmed and are “just confused” so they conveniently “forget” that tidbit. “We haven’t studied it!!” As they’ve been in use for decades for cis and Trans kids and have been studied/developed since the 60s/70s. Sure, Jan. 🤦🏻‍♀️

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 8w

i don’t think they’re trying to say they can’t do that. i think they’re trying to say that gender affirming care is not always surgery, and it includes more than “sex change operations on kids” as conservatives like to put it. it includes puberty blockers, hormones, voice therapy, etc. surgeries can and do happen for older kids, but they’re rare because they have to be on hormones prior to getting surgery, and by banning all gender affirming care for minors, they’re restricting the ability to -

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #11 8w

- start that process before kids go through puberty.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #11 8w

Right, except they directly said that "no child is undergoing cosmetic surgery for being trans" as like, a gotcha ig? My point is that that’s not really accurate and when both sides of a debate say that, those kids do start not being able to get surgeries

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 8w

Like imo trans kids should be allowed to access cosmetic surgeries if they want to and doctors and (not transphobic) parents are on board. I don’t think saying "the hypothetical you're thinking of doesn’t happen" is helpful here. Trans kids have a right to bodily autonomy and a right to not have transphobes sticking their noses into their medical business. Just because they're misinformed about how transitioning works doesn't mean we should sinplify it for them in a way that's more restrictive

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 8w

Top surgery is also EXTREMELY reversible, like you lose milk ducts if you are FtM, but that is so easy to get around. And considering in my experience top surgery mitigates dysphoria more than bottom surgery (from the various trans individuals I have met), even IF we accept the de-transition rhetoric and statistics, we STILL end up with less problems.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #13 7w

It’s so crazy how something being normalized really desensitizes you to the reality of it. I definitely think of circumcision much more negatively now

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 7w

That’s true, I should have been more specific - I was referring more to transphobic people’s complaints of “mutilating” children so I wanted to point out that young children are not having surgery for gender dysphoria, it’s treated (for lack of a better term) with safer alternatives

upvote 3 downvote