Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
psa!
254 upvotes, 12 comments. Yik Yak image post by Anonymous in LGBTQIA+. "psa!"
upvote 254 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

things about this image i don’t like: putting trans man and trans woman in binary is very heteronormative and the image does not even include trans masc and trans femme which are like the two main terms outside of non binary

upvote 46 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

i’m posting this as a cis woman btw!! please continue sharing your experiences 💞 i view this as an image that’s good for explaining things to a level 1 lgbt or a cishet but it's a very very very simplified version of the reality

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

I assume they go under non-binary “And more!”

upvote 40 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

man and woman are binary genders. what's heteronormative about acknowledging that? they aren't non-binary soo I'm confused

upvote 20 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

the gender binary is a system, of which patriarchy and cissexism are constitutive. trans men and trans women necessarily destabilize that system. ftw i dont think it’s helpful to refer to anyone (cis or trans) as a “binary” man or woman, the word people usually mean is “gender conforming”. i think it makes it harder to understand what the gender binary is/refers to and why it’s problematic, it’s not just men and women existing.

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

it is helpful, because I don't mean gender conforming, I'm just talking about how they identify. a man or woman, whether they are cis or trans, are one of two genders in the gender binary system. that's true, those are binary genders. they aren't non- binary genders. avoiding calling it that just seems needlessly nebulous/confusing

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

is your definition of a man/woman “someone who identifies as a man/woman”? because that is not how a person is understood as a subject of the gender binary. the gender binary is a system which posits only two genders, which are opposite and distinct. it doesn’t exist in a vacuum, it is an interlocking system with all other forms of oppression (most relevantly patriarchy and cissexism, but also racism, ableism, etc). man and woman are narrowly understood and defined according to those standards.

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

also tbh i have never found a context where its necessary to specify “binary” man or woman… they’re the two “binary” genders so it is implied, so you can just say man or woman. +ime when someone is using it as label for another person they are usually using it to mean gender-conforming (even if you’re not). i also very rarely see it used as a self-descriptor, so i find it pretty odd when someone applies “binary” as a label to someone else without their identifying with it.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Trans man and trans woman literally is binary…wdym, it’s a person saying they’re fully a man or woman, not somewhere in between the binaries or out of the binary (which both fall under non-binary here)

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

2 is correct here imo -- a binary trans woman. Just because I am trans does not mean I’m not heterosexual nor heteronormative and it doesn’t mean I destabilize the binary. I’m a woman, a girlie, a straight girl. So sorry to not live up to expectations but I do exist within the binary 😨💞

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

man and woman are the two genders of the binary gender system. that is a true statement. as a non-binary person I don't understand your aversion to acknowledging the binary genders. my gender identity is categorized under non-binary. and I'm fine with that. why should it be any different for binary gender identities? I don't get why it's an issue for you but only for them. my gender id gets categorized but the "normal ones" shouldn't be? bc that's what I'm getting

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

me when I use big words just to use them and then my statement is extremely hard to read and makes little sense

upvote 1 downvote