
Genuine question here. I agree that it can be frustrating to see ppl who are 100% comfortable in their AGAB lead conversations about trans rights/struggles. If you aren’t a fan of transmedicalism (which is totally fine, ive seen a lot of transmeds who can be really hateful), then how do you propose we strike that balance?
also the post itself sucks I’m earnestly sick to death of seeing people frame “you can be trans without medically transitioning” as some kind of insidious anti-transition psyop or Pressure against transitioning when it’s just a fact. I have trouble believing people aren’t playing willfully obtuse when they claim to not understand why anyone else would need the reminder / affirmation
if someone self-describes as trans without any intent to pursue transition (not even gonna touch the “presenting as their AGAB” part, that’s a glaring oversimplification) then obviously they do experience some amount of gender euphoria from being the gender they identify as otherwise they would not be motivated to self-describe as trans. you’re crafting a strawman over there
Downvoted cause you’re spitting facts. This whole argument feels like another case of people who are too terminally online trying to make issues about “the discourse”. What about genderfluid people? What about agender people? What about people who are certainly trans but not in a way that they need to change their appearance? In trying to be “inclusive” y’all are excluding many real, atypical, gender experiences (not directed at you #3)
again, non-transitioning people Aren’t leading these conversations to begin with. they aren’t afforded enough legitimacy in their transness by most peers to even be capable of amassing that type of power in our communities—you already got your way. god forbid some of us posit that folks who don’t medically transition be offered a semblance of even-footing with the rest of us
additional reminder: the “assigned” in AFAB is past tense. “AFAB” and “AMAB” aren’t nouns. by using them that way, you reduce people to their assignments-at-birth while needlessly lumping them in categorically with cis people who share said assignment. which is awfully antithetical to an ethos of taking transness seriously
oh you are SO obviously basing your community-wide judgments on your experiences with extremely niche online subcommunities if you think trans women with full beards hold any type of sway over public conversations, holy shit. the “sounding like 30 year old men” comment very loudly announces that you’re stuck operating off some damningly regressive ideas wrt how you view your peers. I don’t think I can be the one to fix that for you over an anonymous app, but please, seriously, work on that shit
trans men don’t “want to be seen as women” no matter what they look like, btw. if they wanted to be seen as women then they would just be cis women and they wouldn’t self-describe as trans. again, utter strawman argument, you are very clearly misrepresenting these guys’ experiences based on what you think a man has to look like. much like how you misrepresented other trans women’s voices based on what you think women have to sound like
disturbing that I even have to say this to another trans person, but trans women aren’t obligated to “try to be feminine”. not only is femininity subjective at both the individual and cultural levels, womanhood also does not ever actually hinge on one’s intent to appeal to conventional femininity. full-stop. it’s like you think transfem butches are a scourge or that it’s your place to define the perimeters of another trans woman’s gender expression
the shit you’re saying about trans women pisses me off not because I have some kind of investment in “winning” an argument with an internet stranger but rather because women I know personally in real life are outright ostracized in cis AND trans spaces by the exact type of rhetoric you spew, and are severely harmed by the experience. and this includes women who ARE transitioning btw