Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Did he actually say this? Idk him at all but I’m surprised for some reason
143 upvotes, 34 comments. Yik Yak image post by Anonymous in LGBTQIA+. "Did he actually say this? Idk him at all but I’m surprised for some reason"
upvote 143 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2d

ya he’s pretty openly supportive of trans and queer people

upvote 74 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2d

he says this - or similar - frequently

upvote 37 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2d

from what i’ve seen, he’s been very supportive of the trans community so i wouldn’t be surprised if he did

upvote 33 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2d

Based

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

Surprised? This is the absolute most in-character thing for him

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

Pretty confident 5 made another post and just admitted that they just don’t like Hasan. Though it might be another person reading far too into a simple backhanded burn on transphobes.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2d

In a good way, not negatively at all

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2d

corny as hell. yeah man, let’s act like bigotry is a diagnosable pathology rather than just enforcement of the status quo… great. let’s talk about mentally ill people as if they’re more likely to be perpetrators of violence rather than victims of it! surely that has never backfired before

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2d

i fear you missed the point completely.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2d

the point is entirely surface-level, it would be impossible to miss. I fear you are unwilling to thinking critically about what it means for mentally ill people when bigotry is labeled a mental illness or mentally ill behavior

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2d

i can’t believe you’re being this pedantic about this when our whole entire existence is under threat by the government. let’s not alienate our allies before we don’t have any at all

upvote 17 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 2d

you do recognize that mentally ill trans people are under double the threat, yeah? I just love how advocating for consideration of my own people is “pedantic” to you as soon as “my own people” is intersectional! anyone who’s alienated by that wasn’t an ally to me in the first place

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2d

r/whoosh

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2d

mark me as unsurprised that the people who refuse to do any critical thinking re: concern for the mentally ill are also so quick to decide that my criticism must mean I simply don’t “get” the thing I’m reacting to. it’s like y’all are just Itching to call me the r-slur

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2d

you’re woke as hell but lowkey right and i'm surprised ur getting such an intense response abt it...

upvote 18 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2d

imo the most harmful part of this is using mental illness as an insult. it’s giving “that’s gay” or “you sound autistic”

upvote 20 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1d

Intense response? They’re the ones being headstrong about it 😂 nobody here is taking them seriously lol

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1d

tbh I’m pretty sure I know exactly why I got downvoted into oblivion for what I said while you got 13 upvotes for saying that I was right. I’m not in the mood to get misinterpreted in 3 different directions or continuously dismissed via middle school bullying behaviors by people who don’t even comprehend what I’m saying though, so I’ll bite my tongue 👍

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

"intense" ❌ "bullying" ❌ idk why they got votes either. your comment is neither "right" nor "woke"

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1d

well no, what I said is that I do believe I know why their comment was upvoted & mine wasn’t, I just don’t feel like wasting my breath at this point because the way I’m being spoken to is obnoxious and not conducive to any kind of real discussion “huehuehue you just don’t Get It” “r/whoosh” etc is in fact some mild middle school bullying type of shit, but dw, I def don’t expect you to have the maturity to own up to that

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 1d

that’s part of what I was getting at, yeah. notice that a couple of the replies to my comment are also sorta giving “you sound autistic” (but with an added layer of plausible deniability)

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

i fear you don't know the meaning of the word "bullying". using sarcasm and rude phraseology to highlight one's elementary misunderstanding of a topic does not constitute bullying. bullying is not when people are rude or flippant. even the grade-school definitions of bullying from merriam-webster don't apply to this; saying "you just don't get it" is not cruel, insulting, aggressive, threatening; nor a behavior or pattern of behavior aimed at causing social, emotional, physical or mental harm

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

ur also poisoning the well in such a disgustingly bad faith way "u just wanna call me the r-slur 😡", "sorta giving 'u sound autistic' 😒" nah. ur simply wrong and i expressed that in a pointed manner. i didn't think u were autistic or disabled prior to u implying it, and it changes absolutely nothing about my stance. sometimes, when people are harsh and pointed with u, it's not because ur disabled or mentally ill or any such thing

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1d

bro I said right off the bat that there’s nothing here to “get” beyond the surface level, and your reaction was to reinforce the idea that I must simply be too stupid to understand the post if you really thought I was missing something, and you were acting in anything Approaching good faith, you would attempt to articulate what you thought I was failing to grasp. citing a dictionary definition doesn’t make that behavior resemble schoolyard taunting any less

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1d

and it’s funny you say that. cause yeah, spot-on, the kids who ostracized me in middle school didn’t consciously recognize that what they were reacting to was cues that I’m autistic and unstable either. they were just acting on an impulse to condescend to + punish someone who registered to them as weird, unreasonable and annoying—someone who deserved to be met with derision and whose perspective should immediately be dismissed. hmmm

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

"r/whoosh" ≠ "you're too stupid to get it". it means the point went over your head - hence the "whoosh" onomatopoeia. i'm sure you're smart enough to get it - if you weren't so enveloped in this woe-is-me narrative (1/?)

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

you fail to realize that somebody not wanting to engage in a substantive conversation with *you* doesn't mean they don't want to have good faith discussions regarding the subject. your initial comment is antagonistic and repellant; and the rest demonstrate a clear stubborn dedication to a narrative. i have no desire to unpack that or convince you otherwise. i do have a desire to express disagreement though, which is perfectly acceptable. i don't owe you discourse and debate

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

there are no "cues" here. this is plaintext, and nothing about what you wrote or how you wrote it is a "cue" about your autism - an AuDHDer

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

you didn't register to me as "weird" you registered to me as somebody being highly antagonistic and sarcastic to make a weak and bad faith argument rooted in juvenile and elementary understandings of a complex, nuanced topic... and i would say it's ableist to imply this is a result of - or unique to - autism. neurotypical people can also be unreasonable and annoying and i respond to them the same way

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

Isn’t he just taking the “trans people are mentally ill” catchphrase that transphobes parrot, and flipping it around? I don’t think he’s genuinely, unironically implying that transphobia is a mental health condition

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1d

also if "r/whoosh" is bullying to you, what do you call this? it's insulting and aggressive. it's also sarcastic and flippant. i wouldn't call this bullying per se, but would you?

post
upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #10 1d

I don’t know him lol

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

commenting on every post bc you’re obsessed with us btw

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

Yeah but he’s a left-wing political commentator. Unless you didn’t even know that about him? And if you didn’t know *literally* anything about him, then I’m confused why you would be surprised that there would be a person with the opinion expressed in the quote

upvote 5 downvote