Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
why are we arguing about lesbians in a way that totally goes against the textbook AND connotative definition. women that fuck men just aren’t lesbians. we are regressing omfg
upvote 34 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2d

i’m not arguing with yall. do your research lmao

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3d

"people that have sex just arent asexuals" see how stupid that sounds

upvote -8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3d

Asexuality is a spectrum, lesbian is not

upvote 23 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3d

And when it comes to asexuals we are not labeling sex repulsed aces “purists” for being uncomfortable with bioessentialist bullshit

upvote 17 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3d

(referring to the second comment you left) i don't really know what you're saying like what does that have to do with lesbians who are we labelling purists? like i just don't understand the comparison could u explain a litte

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3d

do you understand that asexuality and lesbianism are two different things? asexuality is inherently a spectrum. lesbianism has a definition. if you don’t fit the definition- you’re not a lesbian. this is a dumb argument. again- we are regressing.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3d

who makes the definition? what is the definition? when i look it up it says women or nb people attracted PRIMARILY to women or nb people, i just don't understand why its fine for asexuality to be a spectrum but its not fine for lesbianism to have elements of spectrum to it as well

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3d

like is someone who discovers they're attracted to women later in life after having been only with men, but is only with women going forward? what about someone who only has sex with men in threesomes with their female partner? what about someone who is with a partner who transitions and identifies as a man but still considers the relationship lesbian? are they not allowed to be lesbians because the definition is you only ever fuck women?

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3d

Im talking about the podcast clip people have been discussing on here, someone reposted it if you wanted to give it a watch,

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3d

i watched it but i still don't totally understand... was someone calling another person a purist? what would the comparison "bioessentialist bullshit" be for aces vs lesbians? sorry i'm not trying to like be snarky i'm genuinely just a little lost but i want to understand ur point

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2d

The bioessentialism comes from the idea that women are hard wired to be attracted to men biologically, which is why its gross that one guest calls “fucking a man a year” just a“reproductive thing” brought on by ovulation, of course asexuals face some levels of this bs too but from drs, ive heard of drs worrying about a patient’s hormone levels when they self report as asexual, going off of old medicine that labels it as a disorder

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2d

The difference is those drs aren’t usually people within the community which is why this really hurts to hear

upvote 13 downvote