i’m pretty sure the issue you’re having is that you’re misunderstanding which part of their statement is modifying which. the beginning part is a disclaimer, the second is their point. if they did not say biphobia is bad before speaking on bisexuals, people would jump down their throats
Someone commented and deleted that “but most things that are called biphobic arent” and i’d like to post my reply - I think that there are obvious examples of dumb people using it erroneously. But to say “most” is subjective and based on personal experience. I think it’s a problem to start dismissing biphobia as a whole bc of the dumbassery of a select few, which is what my post is about. Idk why this is a hot take but apparently it is :(
again, it sounds like they’re making the same point as op 😭 that some bisexuals will cry biphobia and act as though their straight relationship is being persecuted when it’s not. tbh i think it comes from a place of internalized homophobia/biphobia to need lesbians’ validation for your straight relationship which is very sad. i genuinely hope those people come to feel more comfortable with themselves
Who said what race these hypothetical people are? Your comment feels like oppression olympics. I dont want to start getting into the weeds of semantics, but I’ll say that #1 and #3 are veering into biphobic territory. I also dont want to sit here and call every little thing biphobic, but using silly niche examples of dumb ppl as reasons to dismiss biphobia as a whole shouldnt be encouraged.