if you feel that’s the label that fits you best, sure. but you should know that historically that label meant a bisexual who refused to date men for political reasons. the split attraction model you’re using originated on tumblr. so it just depends if you care about staying true the history of the label you’re using or feel the split attraction model works best for you
tbh you can just call yourself a lesbian if the only shit you’re doing with men is hooking up lol. if you are meaningfully culturally and socially a lesbian and only plan on dating and forming relationships with women, it’s lowkey whatever. your sexual history doesn’t have to impact your label, ex. many gay people have had sex with the opposite sex. there are also many queer people who do sex work, i know a lesbian who has sex with men occasionally (she jokes she’s straight for pay lol).
the historical use of “bisexual lesbian” is exactly what i described—a part of the 60s/70s lesbian feminist movement. the split attraction model is the name for labels where you split romantic attraction and sexual attraction ie biromantic homosexual. it’s much newer and imo not necessary in very many instances, but if you prefer that you could call yourself biromantic and homosexual
i’ve thought about this, but with how people see bisexual USUALLY as romantic attraction it feels like i’m misrepresenting my interests is where my conflict is coming from, because sex isn’t very significant to me and it feels like i’m just telling people i like to fuck anyone😭but saying bisexual homoromantic is like a jump scare to some people
yeah you honestly sound like a lesbian. it’s gonna be an unpopular opinion because people can’t acknowledge that queer reality is messy and doesn’t always fit in their neat boxes and definitions they learned on tumblr lmao. i’m a lesbian, married to a lesbian, been doing this shit for over a decade. try spending some time in queer + lesbian spaces and that might give you more insight as to how you want to identify.