Anonymous #1 3w

i’m not angry, yall were the ones up in my comments being triggered and bringing up a point i already acknowledged and said more than once i wasn’t arguing against. instead of actually talking abt my opinion on the merits, u guys resorted to insults and strawmanning.

-1

Anonymous #1 3w

also coming to a separate post to argue abt it then calling me the one who’s mad is pretty funny ngl

-1

Anonymous OP 3w

nobody we being triggered, we were just telling you its a stupid ass opinion as it goes against the apps policies and intentions

7

Anonymous OP 3w

you made the post im allowed to respond to it

6

Anonymous #1 3w

u actually don’t know how to read

-1

Anonymous #1 3w

also by your logic you should be okay with grindr excluding women if it was in their tos, which u obviously wouldn’t be.

-2

Anonymous #1 3w

i never said u aren’t allowed to respond to it. i’m saying it’s ironic to come on a post to reignite an argument and then call someone else mad

-1

Anonymous OP 3w

if it was in their tos, and stated intentions of the app sure. thx for putting words in my mouth. but thats not the reality we live in so it doesn’t matter

9

Anonymous #1 3w

u do realize a tos is not the end all be all of what SHOULD occur, right?

-2

Anonymous OP 3w

I do. but there is no reason why women shouldn’t be on an app thats for all genders

10

Anonymous #1 3w

that is your opinion!

-2

Anonymous #1 3w

anyways i’m muting this cuz yall are being dense on purpose and invalidating people talking abt gay issues lol

-1

Anonymous OP 3w

the opinion of the app itself

9

Anonymous OP 3w

what gay issue has been invalidated again?

7