Anonymous #1 10w

This is why real victims of abuse aren't always taken seriously cuz of yall wanting to claim everything as such

-2

Anonymous #2 10w

“Real”?? victims aren’t taken serious bc you decide not to.

1

i think this definitely fits tho for the time she yelled at him for 3 hours straight tho

2

Verbally harassed, yes. This also doesn’t mitigate from the fact they’re being verbally abusive tho

3

Anonymous #1 10w

verbal abuse is different than verbal aggression

1

Anonymous #1 10w

Calling two different people “bitch” during separate outbursts shows insecurity, but she never repeatedly targeted anyone. Each was an isolated incident, followed by apologies and making amends. People often mistake these moments for a pattern, but without ongoing, repeated behavior, it’s not verbal abuse.

5

Anonymous #1 10w

Her repeatedly calling Jeremiah a “bitch” or “liar” wasn’t about trying to control or emotionally harm him. She was reacting to him suddenly switching up..one minute saying he liked her and wanted to be with her, then turning around and saying she should’ve gone home. It was a response to mixed signals, not abuse.

6

Anonymous OP 10w

I don’t know why they’re downvoting you when you are correct. Verbal aggression = harmful language in the moment Verbal abuse = ongoing pattern of emotional harm and control to the same person

4

Anonymous #4 10w

There is no verifiable proof supports the idea that she harassed or yelled at him continuously for three hours. It was intense, emotional, and lasted for several segments but not a sustained, uninterrupted verbal assault of that length.

4

Anonymous #2 10w

I get what you’re trying to say, but you’re not landing it with that comment. I think people do need to educate themselves on what verbal abuse is and how it is represented. People like to throw around labels ignorantly without any education. But at the end of the day, we don’t know if their “real victims of abuse” or not.

3

Anonymous #5 10w

“Without ongoing repeated behavior, it’s not verbal abuse” so you’re agreeing that Huda is verbally abusive, thank you.

1

Anonymous #1 10w

if it was ongoing and repetitive it would still be happening

0

Anonymous #1 10w

No, it must be ongoing to specifically targeted people (Jeremiah, Amaya, or Iris

1

Anonymous #5 10w

Wrong. That would just mean that person was verbally abused. If you’re consistently throwing out degrading language, like Huda, then you’re verbally abusive.

3

Anonymous #1 10w

It’s ok. They need therapy cause actually licensed people have stated she was verbally abusive. So if that’s how they wanna treat their partners or if it’s how they’re used to being treated, can’t help them if they don’t want to be treated

4

Anonymous #6 10w

Who are these licensed people? I'm quite literally a therapist and see no such thing. You don't know the girl nor have seen enough of how she behaves in real life to make such a conclusion. And yes, I stand by what I said. Slapping the word abuse on every not-so-positive interaction you see on the Internet only belittles real cases.

3

Anonymous #2 10w

Ok well that’s YOU. the people literally showed their credentials, papers, etc. idk you or what YOURE lying about.

1

Anonymous #6 10w

It's apparent she has exhibited verbal aggression in the beginning of the show, but abuse is absolutely not the word you're looking for. 3 episodes of a reality tv show is not your evidence

2

Anonymous #1 10w

You need to understand that that only applies if its consistently towards a person. For example, if she was continuously calling Amaya or Iris a bitch or other degradating remarks. Having issues with three different people isn't a reflection of a pattern.

3