“Won on technicalities” my ass. The first game they won because of catcher’s interference WITH THE BASES LOADED AND NO OUTS. Even if they didn’t call the catcher’s interference (which is perfectly legit btw), they still probably would’ve scored. Then they won by three runs in the second game with their starter pitching a complete game in dominating fashion. Don’t act like they didn’t deserve the series win. I’m not even the guy who was talking shit but you’re just being biased
I didn’t say anything about the second game. The second game was won fair and square As for the first game, it is absolutely possible to get out of a bases loaded no outs situation. Not likely, but possible. I don’t understand how you can call catchers interference while also simultaneously ruling that the batter did not swing. How can you interfere with the batters swing if he didn’t swing?
He checked his swing. That’s how. Go watch it. It’s the rule. Even if he did swing, there’d only be one out. And you’re saying getting walks is a technicality? That’s called plate discipline and taking advantage of a wild pitcher. That’s not a technicality at all. Baseball isn’t just about getting hits
Walking is not a technicality but you’re leaving out something else that happened in that inning. Harper was on third because another batter was hit by a pitch. If that hadn’t happened, that batter would still be up to bat and Harper would have been on second when the interference was called I’m not biased. The Phillies are obviously the more talented team and they did deserve the series W, but that 1st game was won primarily due to luck
Then the pitcher shouldn’t have hit that batter! The Phillies were patient, had good plate discipline, and capitalized on a pitcher that was clearly struggling to throw strikes. Do you expect them to swing at everything, knowing they’ll get themselves out by swinging at awful pitches? By your logic, nearly every win of every team is just by luck. That’s baseball, not a technicality