Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 21h

Such a weird take imo, you can argue the same thing about normal movie theaters, “I can’t afford to see the movie in a theater how dare they release it in a theater” an artist is going to make their art however they see fit it’s not up to the artist to determine how that art is distributed, do we get angry at da Vinci for only painting one Mona Lisa that I have to fly to Paris to see instead of painting multiple so more ppl can see it? No, so why treat Nolan differently

0

Anonymous OP 20h

It’s up to the artist when he literally chose the type of film to record that is required to be shown on select niche theater types Also nobody bitched about the Mona Lisa because it’s a one of a kind and not for sale lmao

0

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 20h

It’s called an analogy, Nolan made his art the way he wanted and you’re still capable of seeing a portion of it just like how da Vinci made his art the way he wanted and you can see portions of it from pics etc but if you want the full experience you gotta pay more to see the real thing just like the odyssey you gotta pay more to see the full thing it’s very similar

1

Anonymous OP 20h

And pretentious

4

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 20h

So you want Nolan to create not the best way he can just to appease people who can’t afford to see it that way

0

Anonymous OP 20h

Never said that

4

Anonymous OP 20h

Pretentious ≠ wrong

3

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 20h

Basically what you’re saying

0

Anonymous OP 20h

“Oh no I can’t afford the filet at the steak restaurant, therefore they shouldn’t sell the filet” “oh no there’s better graphics on the PS5 compared to my PS4 for the same game therefore they shouldn’t sell a PS5”

0

Anonymous OP 20h

Bro Nolan isn’t gonna let you suck his dick to be in his next film 😭

4

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 20h

And poor ppl won’t have an orgy with you

0

Anonymous OP 20h

Would never want that, champ

4