
According to Lookout Archie Jewell, the lifeboat drills were cancelled owing to inclement weather and the fact that they had already done drills in Southhampton. As for driving the ship at high speed, that was because that was standard practice for Ocean Liners at the time, and was moreso a fault of the Liner industry as a whole rather than this specific Captain.
Again, the weather was not fine, per Archie Jewell’s testimony. British Wreck Commissioner’s Inquiry Day 2 questions 273-280. https://www.titanicinquiry.org/BOTInq/BOTInq02Jewell02.php In addition, SS Amerika travelled at 18 knots, Carpathia at 17, RMS Baltic at 18, and SS Noodham at its full speed. Californian is the exception, not the rule, which only proves my point further. Also, comparing Smith to Hitler? Jesus Christ talk about a disingenuous comparison.
You’re literally citing an accomplice to murder. In any case, several days into a voyage is far too late to begin drilling to use lifeboats (the land drills were obviously worthless considering how unprepared the crew was). And you’re STILL using the bandwagon fallacy. You should have grown out of thinking popular things are automatically correct if you’re old enough to be on this app. And there is literally nothing disingenuous about comparing one mass murdering piece of human garbage to
An accomplice to murder? At this point I’m genuinely questioning whether this is ragebait or not, no, the 23 year old lookout who wasn’t even on duty at the time they struck the iceberg wasn’t an ‘accomplice to murder’. It’s not bandwagoning because again, this was standard practice. Literally every Captain (save for Shackleton) questioned as part of the inquiry said they would have done the same thing as Smith. It is absurd to claim he’s comparable to a man who willfully exterminated millions.
“It’s not bandwagoning because it’s the [literal definition of bandwagon fallacy].” Bro what the fuck are you even doing? Just because lots of captains were okay with committing mass murder doesn’t make it right. Not everything that is popular is valid. I’m considering reporting you because there is almost no way this actually news to anyone aged 18 or older. Either that or you’re just parroting what you read on wikipedia without giving any critical thought to it.
Hey, so posting that image over and over again isn’t going to make you right. To phrase it another way, you seem to be making the argument that either he was willfully trying to murder as many people as possible (for which there is literally no evidence) or that he was negligent/reckless. Except he wasn’t negligent because negligence requires one to act in a way contrary to how a reasonable person would. Since every other Liner Captain interviewed said they would do the same, it cannot be