Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
people be anti intellectual and proud of it lmao. genuinely depressing and dystopian. US education is a massive failure
45 upvotes, 21 comments. Yik Yak image post by Anonymous in Movies. "people be anti intellectual and proud of it lmao. genuinely depressing and dystopian. US education is a massive failure"
upvote 45 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

Media literacy is a fairly overused term tbf

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

I made that comment on the other post. I don’t think it’s bad to analyze movies, I just think the type of people who use the term “media literacy” while doing it tend to be annoying. Saying that’s “dystopian” is overdramatic and ridiculous

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

“Anti intellectual” 🤓

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

Too many people use “media literacy” wrong. I saw someone say that Americans have “no media literacy” because we have a different culture and didn’t get a cultural reference. People say that other people lack media literacy because they disagree with a headcanon. It’s gotten to the point of aggressively incorrect usage that odds are pretty high whoever’s using it is using it wrong, and that turns a lot of people off. It’s not anti-intellectualism to be tired of seeing another 14 year old-

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 7w

i mean it is and dumb people use it too, but there is a media literacy crisis

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

That I agree with

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 7w

lol proving my point

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 7w

-rambling about how everyone lacks media literacy because clearly fight club is about being gay and not a satire of masculinity. Or everyone “literally like has no media literacy anymore” because someone took their words at face value. At this point, “media literacy” just warrants an automatic eye roll from me.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 7w

judge the substance of what someone says. not the words they choose. pretty simple.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 7w

the term “media literacy” is very basic. no one even used that word when analyzing a movie. words being co-opted by dumb people doesn’t mean the words themselves are dumb. and it is dystopian that people will stop reading something because they see a word that annoying people use. it is dystopian that we are practically living in fahrenheit 451. there is a media literacy crisis and denying it is just stupid. ignoring statements with the word does more harm than good

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

Why should I waste my time reading dozens of really bad takes and misuses on the off chance that I see someone use it correctly instead? And why do you feel the need to be so passive aggressive and defensive over someone saying they don’t bother with something that’s become a widely misused buzzword?

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 7w

lmao i was being blunt and condescending, not passive aggressive. seems like you’re misusing terms yourself.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 7w

any time i see or hear the term “passive aggressive” im just going to completely tune out. dumb people use it. why should i waste my time reading dozens of bad takes and misuses?

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

Lmao, condescension is a form of passive aggression, seems like you’re misusing terms yourself.

post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

There’s the defensiveness again. Life would be easier if you didn’t take everything so personally. Maybe a hobby? I made biscotti today, try that.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 7w

lmao passive aggression requires indirectness. text snippet doesn’t change that. condescension can be explicitly and directly aggressive. insane lack of reading comprehension skills

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 7w

omg i’m defending my argument. fuck me, right?

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

So your response to me proving that condescension (which by your own words was what you were doing) is considered passive aggression is to say “wow fuck you I was being regular aggressive way to not comprehend my aggression towards you.” Got it. I don’t think you have anything more to offer this conversation, I pray you’re 14 and will eventually grow up, enjoy your day, you’re right about whatever your point is or whatever else you want to hear.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 7w

holy shit you did not prove condescension is considered passive aggression because that’s objectively wrong. lmao you never had anything of substance to offer to this conversation, you’re just getting clowned on.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 7w

like a college student is trying to argue against the claim that passive aggression requires being passive. this is exactly the dystopian shit i’m talking about. read a book or something jesus christ.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 7w

Well OP is a loser so

upvote 2 downvote