Anonymous #1 6w

744 yds 7 yds 70 receptions with the bears of all teams ain’t bad. The most important thing is that he’s a significant upgrade over Quentin Johnston

7

Anonymous OP 6w

I’m not moved. He’s 36 tackles away from turning into dust. We ain’t impressed with Mr. Allen

4

Anonymous #1 6w

He better pull a Tyler Lockett and go down after every catch then. #fuckYAC

5

Anonymous mr.orangutan 6w

This is what a league average receiver room looks like lmao. If Herbie chokes in the playoffs again it’s on him

0

Anonymous #3 6w

There’s a lot of teams with better receiving rooms

1

Anonymous mr.orangutan 6w

That’s what league average means lmao. You can’t call him an elite qb and claim he needs an elite wr room to succeed.

0

Anonymous #3 6w

No one said he needs an elite receiver room, just one that has reliable guys, also if majority of teams have a better receiving room then he wouldn’t have league average.

1

Anonymous mr.orangutan 6w

He has a stud WR1, a reliable veteran, and a promising rookie. He has what he needs. And that group is in the 15-20 range.

0

Anonymous #3 6w

He’s definitely got the best receiver room in the division. There’s not much competition ofc

1

Anonymous #3 6w

Ladd is good, Allen is washed, and Tre Harris hasn’t proven himself yet, being a “promising” rookie means nothing.

1

Anonymous OP 6w

Chiefs and Broncos have better receiving rooms, I think there’s even a debate to be made for the Raiders having a better receiving room with how elite Bowers already is.

1

Anonymous #3 6w

There’s 23 other teams that have better receiving rooms than the Chargers

1

Anonymous mr.orangutan 6w

750 yards and 7 tds on a horrible offense is not washed. Chargers receiving room is way better than the Chiefs and Raiders, and probably Broncos too but it’s tighter.

1

Anonymous mr.orangutan 6w

Name them lmfao

1

Anonymous #3 6w

You can still be productive but washed, Keenan is not as good as he used to be. Ladd and friends is not better than Rice, Worthy, Brown, and Kelce. Ladd and friends is not better than Bowers, Meyers, and Tucker…Jeanty is also a good receiving back btw. Broncos have Sutton, Mims, and Engram among others. The reason why a lot of people are low on the Chargers this year is bc they barely worked on their receiver room that needed help badly.

0

Anonymous #3 6w

Give me a second

1

Anonymous mr.orangutan 6w

Bowers isn’t a receiver bruh. I’m talking strictly receivers. Raiders only have meyers, chiefs only have worthy and rice, who Ladd is already better than both, and broncos only have Sutton, who id also argue is worse than Ladd like I said

1

Anonymous mr.orangutan 6w

Kelce is washed also not a receiver, Jeanty isn’t a receiver, engram isn’t a receiving why are you naming all these non receivers

1

Anonymous mr.orangutan 6w

Ladd is better than Rice, it’s way too early to say Keenan is better than Worthy, Brown is a nonfactor and Kelce is more washed than Keenan. Meyers would be wr3 on the Chargers, Raiders have Bowers and nothing. Harris and Hampton are good receiving backs too. Broncos are close but I think Ladd is better than Sutton.

1

Anonymous #3 6w

I mean to say it’s way too early to call Worthy better than Keenan.

1

Anonymous OP 6w

We ain’t impressed with Mr. Lockett either

3