
-opinion that’s almost certainly wrong (pats destroy teams) -no, Dak -true, except Maye wasn’t stat padding, just playing perfect offense -stafford’s passer rating is worse and he worse efficiency stats. -harder teams, but much easier defenses. Try sticking to the truth and your arguments would be better -
my point is these stats are completely meaningless, why does it matter that Maye has one more Y/A when he has 12 less TDs? or completion percentage when he’s played some of the leagues worst defenses? or yards per attempt when he can’t even score as much as stafford? Stafford has very clearly been the better player this year and it’s genuine bias if you don’t agree
-better defenses like the raiders, jets, dolphins, bills, titans, bengals, bucs, panthers???? give me a break buddy -pats destroy bottom feeders, rams beat real contenders -i just said they are still impressive and above average, thanks for reading! -is clearly biased -going for it on 4th down up 28 points on the jets is apparently not stat padding -“well Maye deserves to win because advanced ratings said so!!!”
In this argument you: Don’t acknowledge SoS or turnovers once, think Maye deserves to win over Stafford despite having 12 less TDs because his Y/A and completion percentage is higher 💀, think Maye played better defenses somehow, and calls going for it on 4th down against the jets up 28 “perfect offense.” I’m the biased one here though lmao