He never developed those “Football IQ” skills because he didn’t play enough college ball. He was so insanely athletic that he waltzed through high school using pure athleticism. He barely played in college so didn’t gain much there. By time he got to the NFL, he hit a point where he can’t out-athleticism defenses but doesn’t have any of the “Football IQ” skills to help him
I get what you’re saying and I generally agree, he could be worse, we’ve certainly seen far far worse than AR. but I think the difference you pointed out is commensurate of the same intrinsic problem. An “okay” ball thrown at great depth, aka a 50/50 ball, increasingly favors the offense every yard it travels, unless you’re looking at multi-coverage or a top 10 CB/DB. AR gets bailed out by above average receiving, but short yardage throws/def. reads are the bread and butter of gridiron football
As a Colts watcher it was not my takeaway from the previous season that the receivers weren’t good; I can certainly agree with the year-end statistics that support they underperformed compared to the rest of the league. Tyler Warren absolutely was brought on to provide consistent yard for gain, there’s no debate about that. I still believe my previous comment stands that the talent on the receiving core overcame large deficits in the passing play directing them
appreciate the explanation— I’d wanted to rearticulate the importance of ‘24 Colts route running in mine, but ran out of characters, lol. I actually sympathize with the Pittman take! I thought highly of his potential but felt he was somewhat wasted in that offense. I think we definitely share competing ideals on the degree to which AR helped/hurt that offense, but I otherwise agree with your more specific take on the receiving core