Anonymous oversleepingprize 7w

I want what you’re on rn

1

Anonymous #1 7w

I’m joking but it’d be the most bengals thing I could see happen. Who needs defense when you can get another wr

-1

Anonymous #1 7w

I mean Fant is definitely an upgrade over Gesicki imo and I am very interested to see how he does with a QB like Burrow, but it still absolutely blows my mind that the Bengals are choosing to sign offensive players instead of idk… SIGNING YOUR BEST DEFENSIVE PLAYER??? I’m not a Bengals fan but they are started to irritate me

0

Anonymous oversleepingprize 7w

They’d go from 9-8 to 9-8 with that move

5

Anonymous #3 7w

But they’d score 52 points a game instead of 49

-1

Anonymous #3 7w

It’s the bengals my guy, I kinda get it bc a stupid one year deal for a player like fant is gonna be easy. My problem is that they kept Higgins. They could’ve signed Jamarr and Trey, the big guys you have to worry about, and could’ve gotten a pretty decent haul in picks for Higgins which they could’ve used to bulk up that d. They already have yoshi, a pretty decent backup wr option, a solid starting running back, solid options in gesicki and more fant like you said. I think they fucked up

1

Anonymous #1 7w

Their entire roster building by paying Higgins as much as they did

1

Anonymous oversleepingprize 7w

I mean they’re both in the same boat of wanting to be paid like the best at their position despite being old asf and not the best at their position

1

Anonymous #4 7w

Yeah but the difference is Cincinnati bends if it means making burrow smile more. Terry would do that

-1