interception —> ghost defensive PI seems like a crazy game-deciding swing no?
0
🍣
Anonymous#21d
Yup! As a Raiders fan! I fucking hate the Broncos but the calls were accurate with modern officiating
6
🍣
AnonymousOP1d
1. Refs didn’t influence the first one, 2. That was PI, 3. Stop hating on refs bro, rams still have 42 seconds. 4) I’m a raiders fan. I fucking hate the broncos
3
Anonymoussushi_is_the_best1d
You missed the point. It would’ve been a rams int if the PI wasn’t called. Receiver flopped like crazy — shouldn’t be a PI. If every bit of contact gets called at PI, it makes the game unwatchable and it’ll just turn into the NBA
0
🍣
AnonymousOP1d
Yes, because it was a clear PI. Receiver just further sold it. And like I said, the Rams still have a change dawg. Not as bad as SGA kissing NBA officials man 🤣
3
Anonymoussushi_is_the_best1d
Well that’s where the difference of opinion is. IDT a teeny bit of contact should be deemed as PI, esp when the call has such a big impact on the game. So regardless of whether or not it IS PI by the RULES, I think the rules don’t make sense 🤷♀️
1
🍣
AnonymousOP1d
Yeah, I do agree with you there. PI is a rule that needs clarification, especially with off the ball contact. Holding needs to be called more for those, especially since it’s a spot foul in the NFL