Sure it becomes real for the people believing it, but this doesnāt reflect the ACTUAL truth. When people say their god is supposed to dictate everyoneās actions, changing laws due to their beliefs, what are we supposed to do with that? We canāt just say āok sure thatās true for u so Iāll let your god tell me what to doā
Sooo, god calls his believers to live a certain way, but donāt tell others to live that way bc thatās judging them? And also he does condemn nonbelievers too, especially those who used to believe and now donāt. So this causes believers of all kinds to try to save / force their beliefs on people who they think are going to hell. God wants that. Itās called spreading the word
U can say these differences are trivial, but these separate interpretations have led to a ridiculously wide range of lifestyles and actions among religious groups. Doesnāt matter if the god itself is the same being when people can interpret its word in such wildly different ways. For all intents and purposes, they are worshipping different gods.
Nah itās more so cultural adaptations to Godās words. Like Arabian culture is pretty different than Jewish culture, and of course like the Romans spearheaded the Catholic Church. I actually recommend reading the texts of all three. Youāll be surprised by how much it overlaps. Itās just people infuse tradition into the Word of God, and thatās why it appears to be so ādrastically different.ā
Overlapsā¦lol, I mean the Torah is EXACTLY the first five books of the Bible, like Jesus was literally a Jewish man. The Bible makes it very clear he was a Jew. The Muslims talk about Hagar, Abrahamās maidservant, and her birth to Ishmael which started the Muslim nation. That story is in all three texts. So itās very clear itās the same God. Itās just a matter of how different cultures apply the texts according to their tradition, which Jesus warns about in the New Testament.
No. Thereās a difference between judgement and counsel. One is punishment, the other is genuine advice through the lens of love. It is up to the individual to decide whether they want to accept God into their hearts and the Bible makes it very clear we are not to force beliefs onto anyone. Unfortunately, imperialists completely ignored that and twisted his word. In some towns Jesus was rejected, and he NEVER forced them to listen to them. He simply listened, and left the town and let them be.
Sure, but the bottom line of all this is still the threat of hell. Which (understandably) strongly motivates people to āsaveā the world with their belief system. One example is abortion..the argument that itās morally wrong is often rooted in religious beliefs. And religious people say youāll go to hell if u get an abortion, and that itās murder and evil. But not everyone sees it that way, especially if you dont have a Bible telling you that life begins at conception. This is just 1 example
I understand all this, and yeah sure we can say itās the same god in that sense. But effectively what we have today is different gods with similar histories. And going back to the original post, i still think itās valid to say āthe Christian godā, as opposed to the version of god that Judaism/ Islam worship.
The Bible literally says in Exodus if an injured pregnant woman is hit and the baby dies, the abuserās penalty is a fine, but if the woman dies, itās considered ālife for a lifeā penalty. Additionally, thereās no verse in the Bible that says those who get an abortion are going to hell. Science tells you life begins at conception. The Bible says the soul is created at conception but that doesnāt mean the fetus has the same status as a human. The fetusās soul will be in heaven.
The threat of hell is not what should compel a believer to come to Christ. Unfortunately, thatās the narrative that has been pushed. The belief in Jesus, who represents perfect love and goodness and truth should be what compels. Also, God is the final judge, so itās not as black and white as other people might frame it to be.
At the end of the day, the idea of hell IS black and white. You either are tortured for eternity, or you are in some state of joy for eternity. Thatās it. And for people who believe in this kind of reality, it is very scary to imagine their loved ones going to hell. So beliefs are continuously pushed onto people, through fear of literal torture. You can say that itās not what god intended, but that is the real and logical conclusion brought about by the threat of hell.
The idea of hell is not black and white actually. The Bible is a little vague in terms of how many types of hell and what each one entails. Additionally, there wouldnāt be a judgment day if the path to paradise or hell was so black and white. Beliefs shouldnāt be pushed through the lens of torture but yes, I agree with you that unfortunately a lot of Christians do force it upon people even though God tells them not to. Jesus warns a lot about those who call themselves āChristiansā butā¦
But I still maintain that the idea of hell itself is black and white, and ridiculous. There are literally only 2 options, which boil down to infinite happy or infinite agony. All based on what, some pretty vague stuff as youāre putting it. A book which has been interpreted a million different ways. Youād think, with the gravity of the situation, god wouldāve been clear in their guidance on how to get the good option. God wouldāve known how many millions of people would misinterpret it
I went to 12 years of catholic school, and the teaching my entire life was, Hell is complete torture and agony. So you better stay in Catholicism, bc hell is the only other option. And itās just so so beautiful and loving that God is saving us from this hell he createdā¦.Itās simply so fucked up that this is being taught. And I believed it for so so long
My other gripe w that- god supposedly created us as intelligent smarty pant humans, he values our intellect, yet, for the most important decision of our life, we need to have faith. Faith in a story, and a highly fractured religion, based on ancient texts, with no real continuing evidence. If this was the truth, it would be completely evident and obvious in all aspects of life and in science. Donāt create me to be a logical human if my salvation depends on faith (aka abandoning logic)
There would not be a hell if the devil did not fall from grace and seek to destroy mankind. There is a ton of evidence that points to God, though God is outside the system, so he can give you as much information as youād like, but itās up to you and the end of the day to believe. Itās not that hard to believe. Itās very easy. It doesnāt mean you canāt doubt or not have questions, in fact God invites questioning, but at the end of the day you just gotta have faith and thatās enough.
And god just allowed satan to do that, for the plot I guess, introducing unimaginable amounts of human suffering into the world, bc that will allow us to find god through it all and prove we ~love him~. Totally necessaryā¦if god created literal reality, he knew satan was gonna rebel, he knew evil was gonna exist, then he created evil too. For what? There is no good answer. Does suffering really need to exist in order for us to love god? Of course not.
And I actually find Christianity very hard to believe, although it used to be the most natural thing to me. Growing up being taught only about Jesus, and this god, of course itās easy to believe. But having learned more about natural history, human history, psychology, sociology, etc etc, it is much much harder to restrict my mind to this one religion and simply have faith. I see it now as one of many religions that humans have created bc itās in our nature. And thatās a beautiful thing still
Why said you have to restrict your mind? God told us to be knowledgeable, to be scholars. Religion does not contradict science, but gives you meaning and understanding of the absolute truths that build this universe. When you understand how the world and universe works, you are understanding the mind of God.
If evil never existed, if we werenāt biologically wired to do āevilā things, why would we be tempted toward it? Also I donāt believe that anyone has 100% free will anyway, but thatās beside the point. My point is that evil, suffering never HAD to exist for us to love god and get through this life.
This is how I saw god before I left Christianity, it is the universe, nature, everything good and bad, the awe of existence. And I still feel drawn to the spirit of existence or whatever u wanna call it. Itās just now, I donāt call it the Christian, abrahamic god. I donāt assume it thinks, or interacts with us, or is humanlike, or is conscious. I donāt need to assign it to a religion. Bc I donāt think this spirit of existence exists outside the human mind. Itās a reflection of our ability to
You absolutely donāt need to assign it to a religion. Thatās why Iām non-denominational. I canāt stand a lot of religious environments. I read the Bible and interpret it for myself. Thatās an amazing and very valid way to look at it and I also see God like that. He is the Universe, he is within all of creation, he is the beginning and the end, he is eternal. He even says āI am who I am.ā I get you and I really empathize. Itās really tough out here, but donāt let it get you down.
Iām glad youāve found a way that works for you!!, but I personally donāt see a need to follow a Bible that says a bunch of contradictory stuff, or please my parents who are very Catholic, just to connect to my awe of existence. To me those two things have become very separate in my mind. Although in the past, the Christian god was the most easy accessible way to understand this awe. But now, Iām very proud of where Iāve gotten to in my beliefs, and it never gets me down
yeah, itās kind of an interesting philosophical question. If one singular god exists, matching a religious interpretation or otherwise, I personally would find it reasonable to consider the praise of all 3 to be at least partially directed towards it, even if their interpretation is wrong